Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: RK 2003 [120'/60] Comparison old / new

Author: Kurt Utzinger

Date: 02:15:53 07/19/03

Go up one level in this thread


On July 19, 2003 at 04:21:39, Drexel,Michael wrote:

>On July 18, 2003 at 13:19:47, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>English
>>If we compare the following, nobody would believe that the same engines had
>>played the same tournament with only a small difference: the books
>>
>>Français
>>Si on compare les résultats suivants, on ne peut guère croire que les memes
>>modules ont joués le meme tournoi avec une petite différence: les livrets
>>d'ouvertures:
>>
>>Deutsch
>>Betrachtet man den nachstehenden Vergleich, ist kaum zu glauben, dass dieselben
>>Programme dasselbe Turnier gespielt haben mit einem kleinen Unterschied:
>>verschiedene Bücher:
>>
>>RK 2003 tournament 120'/60+60'/30+30'
>>Results with draw book remis.ctg for all engines
>>after 84 games [each engine 21 games]
>>
>>    Program                            Score     %    Av.Op.  Elo    +   -
>>
>>  1 TK 3.23 SKR                    :  15.5/ 21  73.8   2476   2656  129 141
>>  2 Fritz 8                        :  11.5/ 21  54.8   2495   2528  158 118
>>  3 Shredder 7.04                  :  11.0/ 21  52.4   2497   2513  162 109
>>  4 Hiarcs 8                       :  11.0/ 21  52.4   2497   2513  162  96
>>  5 Chess Tiger 15                 :  10.5/ 21  50.0   2499   2499  122 122
>>  6 Ruffian 1.0.5                  :   9.0/ 21  42.9   2505   2455   97 153
>>  7 Deep Sjeng 1.5                 :   8.0/ 21  38.1   2509   2425  100 145
>>  8 Junior 8                       :   7.5/ 21  35.7   2512   2410  148 142
>>
>>
>>RK 2003 tournament 120'/60+60'/30+30'
>>Results with own books for all engines
>>after 84 games [each engine 21 games]
>>
>>
>>    Program                            Score     %    Av.Op.  Elo    +   -
>>Draws
>>
>>  1 Shredder 7.04                  :  13.0/ 21  61.9   2490   2574  145 100
>>  2 Junior 8                       :  13.0/ 21  61.9   2490   2574  145 117
>>  3 Fritz 8                        :  11.0/ 21  52.4   2498   2515  162 109
>>  4 Ruffian 1.0.5                  :  11.0/ 21  52.4   2498   2515  162  96
>>  5 Deep Sjeng 1.5                 :  10.5/ 21  50.0   2500   2500  133 133
>>  6 Hiarcs 8                       :   9.5/ 21  45.2   2504   2471   89 158
>>  7 The King 3.23 skr              :   8.5/ 21  40.5   2508   2441  107 149
>>  8 Chess Tiger 15.0               :   7.5/ 21  35.7   2513   2411   91 142
>>
>>Further details at:
>>Détails additionnels chez:
>>Weitere Details unter:
>>
>>http://www.utzingerkurt.com (section RK 2003)
>
>I believe the book IS responsible for the different results of The King and
>Junior 8 (scored 4/4 with 1.e4).
>Chesstiger probably has just bad luck in your second tournament so far.
>The King was almost always out of book some moves before its opponent got out of
>book.
>This is very important.
>
>Deep Sjeng 1.5 - The King 3.23 skr [B09]
>RK 2003  Ath 1.3/64  120'/60 Zurich (1.3), 04.07.2003
>
>1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.f4 Bg7 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Bd3 Na6 7.0-0 c5 8.d5 Bg4 Black
>last book move 9.Bc4 Nc7 10.h3 White last book move 10...Bc8 11.Re1 a6 12.a4 e6
>13.a5 exd5 14.exd5 Re8 15.Bd2 Rxe1+ 16.Qxe1 Nb5 17.Na4 Bf5 18.Nb6 Rb8 19.c3 Qc7
>20.Qf1 Na7 21.g4 Be4 22.Re1 Re8 23.Re3 Qd8 24.g5 Nh5 25.Qe1 f5 26.gxf6 Nxf6
>27.Ng5 Bf5 28.Ne6 Qb8 29.b4 cxb4 30.cxb4 Nh5 31.Be2 Bxe6 32.dxe6 Nxf4 33.Bc4 Nc6
>34.Re4 Nh5 35.e7+ Kh8 36.Bf7 Nf6 37.Bxe8 Qxe8 38.Re3 Ne5 39.Bc3 Qxe7 40.Nc8 Qe6
>41.Nxd6 Qxd6 42.Bxe5 Qd7 43.Rf3 Qe7 44.Qc3 Ne8 45.Bxg7+ Nxg7 46.Qe5 Qd8 47.Qf6
>Qxf6 48.Rxf6 Nf5 49.b5 1-0
>
>[D] r2q1rk1/ppn1ppbp/3p1np1/2pP4/2B1PPb1/2N2N1P/PPP3P1/R1BQ1RK1 b - - 0 10
>
>Black was probably lost after the first own move 10...Bc8??.
>Btw Fritz 8 and Chesstiger 15 (in CA) would also play this move.
>10...Bxf3 is correct of course.
>
>Analysis by Fritz 8:
>
>10...Bxf3 11.Qxf3 e6 12.dxe6 fxe6 13.Be3 Qe7 14.Rad1 h6
>  ±  (0.72)   Depth: 7/28   00:00:00  124kN
>10...Bc8!
>  ²  (0.69)   Depth: 7/28   00:00:00  137kN
>10...Bc8!
>  ²  (0.53)   Depth: 7/28   00:00:00  163kN
>10...Bc8 11.Qe2 b5 12.Bxb5
>  ²  (0.50)   Depth: 7/28   00:00:00  241kN
>10...Bc8 11.a4 e6 12.Qd3 exd5 13.Nxd5 Nfxd5 14.Bxd5 Nxd5 15.Qxd5 Qe7 16.a5
>  ²  (0.56)   Depth: 8/28   00:00:00  387kN
>10...Bc8 11.Qd3 Nd7 12.Qe3 Nb6 13.Bd3 h6 14.a3 e6 15.dxe6
>  ²  (0.44)   Depth: 9/32   00:00:02  1200kN
>10...Bc8 11.Qd3 Nd7 12.Be3 Nb6 13.Bb3 h6 14.f5 gxf5 15.exf5 Bd7
>  ²  (0.47)   Depth: 10/33   00:00:04  2372kN
>10...Bc8 11.Qd3 Nd7 12.Be3 Nb6 13.Bb3 h6 14.Rae1 Qd7 15.a3 Re8
>  ²  (0.47)   Depth: 11/33   00:00:08  5223kN
>10...Bc8 11.Qd3 Nd7 12.Be3 Nb6 13.Bb3 h6 14.Rae1 Ne8 15.e5 Bf5 16.Ne4
>  ²  (0.50)   Depth: 12/39   00:00:23  14773kN
>10...Bc8 11.a4 e6 12.dxe6 Bxe6 13.Bxe6 fxe6 14.e5 dxe5 15.fxe5 Qxd1 16.Rxd1 Nfd5
>17.Ne4 Nb4 18.c4 Nc2
>  ²  (0.50)   Depth: 13/38   00:00:58  38223kN
>10...Bc8 11.a4 a6 12.Qd3 b6 13.Be3 h6 14.Bd2 Re8 15.Ne2 Nd7 16.Bc3 Bxc3
>  ²  (0.50)   Depth: 14/40   00:02:42  111081kN
>
>Michael


     Hi Michael
     The move 10...Bc8 was indeed a bad one. But The King and other programs
     chosing this move too may overestimate the strenght of the bishop pair.
     Kurt




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.