Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Chesstiger 15.0 and Nolot 1 position : more than +1 after 4h

Author: Vincent Lejeune

Date: 03:00:52 07/19/03



I will let run all nolot positions overnight with Chesstiger 15.0
(I promised all chess Valentin Albillo positions some time ago, they'll come)


Barton 2800+, 384 MB HT
No new move after 8h
Get the right move is not difficult even some years ago for engine but get +1
with a normal engine (no favor sac and no favor attack) is good

french notation, sorry...

Nolot.1,H
r3qb1k/1b4p1/p2pr2p/3n4/Pnp1N1N1/6RP/1B3PP1/1B1QR1K1 w - - 0 1

Analysis by Chess Tiger 15.0:

1.Dd4
  ±  (1.06)   Profondeur: 1   00:00:00
1.Dd4
  ²  (0.66)   Profondeur: 1   00:00:00
1.Dd4 c3 2.Fxc3 Cxc3 3.Txc3 Fxe4 4.Fxe4
  ±  (0.88)   Profondeur: 2   00:00:00
1.Dd4 Tc8 2.Ce3
  ²  (0.62)   Profondeur: 3   00:00:00  6kN
1.Dd4 Cd3 2.Fxd3 cxd3 3.Txd3 Cf4
  ±  (0.84)   Profondeur: 4   00:00:00  10kN
1.Dd4 Cd3 2.Fxd3 cxd3 3.Txd3 Cf4 4.Tde3
  ±  (0.84)   Profondeur: 5   00:00:00  22kN
1.Dd4 Cf4 2.Cxh6 Fxe4 3.Txe4 Txe4 4.Dxe4 Ce2+ 5.Rh2 Dxe4 6.Fxe4 Cxg3 7.Fxa8
  ²  (0.44)   Profondeur: 6   00:00:00  56kN
1.Dd4 Cf4 2.Cxh6 Ch5 3.Cf5 Cxg3 4.fxg3
  ²  (0.64)   Profondeur: 7   00:00:00  128kN
1.Dd4 Cf4 2.Dxc4 Fxe4 3.Txe4 d5 4.Txe6 dxc4 5.Txe8 Txe8
  =  (0.18)   Profondeur: 8   00:00:00  208kN
1.Dd4 c3 2.Txc3 Cxc3 3.Fxc3 d5 4.Fxb4 dxe4 5.Fc3 Td6 6.Dc4
  ³  (-0.52)   Profondeur: 9   00:00:01  604kN
1.Dd4 c3 2.Txc3 Cxc3 3.Fxc3 d5 4.Fxb4 dxe4 5.Fc3 Td6 6.Dc4
  ³  (-0.52)   Profondeur: 10   00:00:03  1444kN
1.Dd4 c3 2.Fxc3 Cxc3 3.Dxb4 Cxe4 4.Dxb7 Tb8 5.Dxb8 Dxb8 6.Fxe4
  µ  (-0.86)   Profondeur: 11   00:00:06  2807kN
1.Dd4 c3 2.Fxc3 Cxc3 3.Dxb4 Cxe4 4.Dxb7 Tb8 5.Dxb8 Dxb8 6.Fxe4
  µ  (-0.86)   Profondeur: 12   00:00:17  7897kN
1.Ce3 Txe4 2.Fxe4 Dxe4 3.Cxd5 Dxd5 4.Dc1 Df5 5.Dxh6+ Dh7 6.De6
  ³  (-0.52)   Profondeur: 12   00:00:30  14496kN
1.Ce3 Txe4 2.Fxe4 Dxe4 3.Cxd5 Dxd5 4.Dc1 Df5 5.Dxh6+ Dh7 6.De6 Cd3 7.Te2
  ³  (-0.52)   Profondeur: 13   00:00:42  20337kN
1.Ce3 Txe4 2.Fxe4 Dxe4 3.Cxd5 Dxd5 4.Dc1 Df5 5.Dxh6+ Dh7 6.Dg5
  µ  (-0.80)   Profondeur: 14   00:01:34  47344kN
1.Cxh6 c3 2.Cf5 cxb2 3.Dg4 Df7 4.Rh2 Rg8 5.Cg5 Tg6 6.Dh4 Txg5
  =  (-0.24)   Profondeur: 14   00:04:31  140573kN
1.Cxh6 c3 2.Cf5 cxb2 3.Dg4 Fc8 4.Te2 Th6 5.Cexd6 Dh5 6.Cxh6 Fxg4 7.Cdf7+ Dxf7
  ²  (0.50)   Profondeur: 15   00:10:22  326146kN
1.Cxh6 c3 2.Cf5 cxb2 3.Dg4 Fc8 4.Te2 Th6 5.Cexd6 Dh5 6.Dxh5 Txh5 7.Cxg7
  ²  (0.48)   Profondeur: 16   00:22:51  732319kN
1.Cxh6 c3 2.Cf5 cxb2 3.Dg4 Fc8 4.Te2 Th6 5.Cexd6 Dh5 6.Cxh6 Fxg4 7.Cdf7+ Dxf7
  ²  (0.48)   Profondeur: 17   00:57:55  1890842kN
1.Cxh6 c3 2.Cf5 cxb2 3.Dg4 Fc8 4.Dh4+ Th6 5.Cxh6 gxh6 6.Te2 De5 7.Cg5 Df6 8.Te8
  ±  (1.38)   Profondeur: 18   04:17:48  8529558kN



Post from 1994 about Nolot and Nolot 1 :

From: mfb@cnam.cnam.fr (Marc-Francois Baudot)
! fhh@watson.ibm.com (Feng-Hsiung Hsu) writes:
!
! >Sometime ago, the following 11 positions collected by Pierre Nolot were
! >posted to rgc.  Pierre claimed that no computers can solve any of them
! >in reasonable time (and no micros in even a few weeks).  A long while back,
he
! >might be right.  At this point, a few of them are solvable even under
! >tournament time control.  The ones that we tried overnight are all solvable
! >in a few hours.  DT-2 was searching around 3 million nodes/sec during the
! >runs.  The time probably would be reduced by 5-30 times for the harder
! >problems if the machine has a better quiescence search.
!
! I just phoned Pierre, and he admits he is very impressed by DT-2'sresults!
! So am I, and we thank you for the time you have spent on these positions.
! I'll post the solutions according to Pierre as given in Gambisco
! separately, but first I'll just give you his comments on DT's outstanding
! results (much much better than the best micros)
!
!
! >1 ;r3;q;b1;k/1;b4;p1/;p2;p;r2;p/3;n4/p;n;p1n1n1/6rp/1b3pp1/1b1qr1k1/40
!
! >Source: Kasparov-Karpov, Lyon 1990.
!
! >Kasparov played Nh6 here.  DT-2 agreed with Kasparov's analysis after
! >going down the line given in Informant, but could not find the move
! >on its own in one hour time.  When letting it run overnight, it produced
! >Nh6 after 8 hours (but would play it with a 6 hours/move time control; that
! >is, it got first indication that the combination might work after about 6
! >hours), with the variation 1. Nh6! c3 2. Nf5 cb2 3. Qg4 ... which wins for
! >white.
!
! Very good. This is not an easy one!



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.