Author: Slater Wold
Date: 14:37:46 07/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 20, 2003 at 17:07:20, Ingo Bauer wrote: >On July 20, 2003 at 16:05:30, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >>A very nice game! There are two domains the computers are still weaker than >>humans: closed positions (see my yesterday's game against Junior 8), and >>endgames (your today's game against Shredder 7.04). >> >>The decisive blunder of Shredder was at the following position: >>[D]6k1/p4pp1/5n2/3pp2p/8/1PN1P3/P4PPP/6K1 b - - 0 23 >>Here it played 23... d4 which after 24. exd4 exd4 25. Nb5 d3 26. Kf1 a6 27. Nc3 > >Yes a bad move! >In analysis mode S7.04 needs 28s on A@2300Mhz with 512 MB Hash. It would need >about 56s on a A1200 like the SSDF is using it. With 64MB Hash (like in the game >that was played) Shreder needed 5 seconds longer (33s) on my PC. Also take into account it was playing on a P3 650mhz. It would have taken probably, 3+ minutes to find it on that hardware.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.