Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 14:40:13 07/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 20, 2003 at 17:07:20, Ingo Bauer wrote: >On July 20, 2003 at 16:05:30, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >>A very nice game! There are two domains the computers are still weaker than >>humans: closed positions (see my yesterday's game against Junior 8), and >>endgames (your today's game against Shredder 7.04). >> >>The decisive blunder of Shredder was at the following position: >>[D]6k1/p4pp1/5n2/3pp2p/8/1PN1P3/P4PPP/6K1 b - - 0 23 >>Here it played 23... d4 which after 24. exd4 exd4 25. Nb5 d3 26. Kf1 a6 27. Nc3 > >Yes a bad move! >In analysis mode S7.04 needs 28s on A@2300Mhz with 512 MB Hash. It would need >about 56s on a A1200 like the SSDF is using it. With 64MB Hash (like in the game >that was played) Shreder needed 5 seconds longer (33s) on my PC. > > >Engine: Shredder 7.04 >by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen > 12/18 0:00 +0.16 1...d4 2.exd4 exd4 3.Nb5 d3 4.Kf1 a6 5.Nd6 Kf8 6.Ke1 Ke7 >7.Nf5+ Kf8 (481.918) 600.8 > 13/18 0:01 +0.16 1...d4 2.exd4 exd4 3.Nb5 d3 4.Kf1 a6 5.Nd6 Kf8 6.Ke1 Nd5 >7.Nc4 Ke7 8.Kd2 (902.895) 612.9 > 14/21 0:01 -0.09-- 1...d4 2.exd4 exd4 3.Nb5 d3 4.Kf1 a6 5.Nc7 a5 6.Ke1 d2+ >7.Kxd2 a4 (1.197.687) 619.6 > 14/21 0:02 -0.17 1...d4 2.exd4 exd4 3.Nb5 d3 4.Kf1 a6 5.Nc7 a5 6.Ke1 Ng4 >7.h3 Ne5 8.Kd2 Kh7 (1.293.357) 623.9 > 15/23 0:05 -0.14 1...d4 2.exd4 exd4 3.Nb5 d3 4.Kf1 a6 5.Nc7 a5 6.Ke1 Ng4 >7.h3 Ne5 8.Kd2 Kh7 9.Nd5 (3.379.912) 626.1 > 16/25 0:08 -0.12 1...d4 2.exd4 exd4 3.Nb5 d3 4.Kf1 a6 5.Nc7 a5 6.Ke1 Ne4 >7.f3 Nc5 8.Nd5 Kh7 9.Kd2 Kg6 (5.234.131) 626.6 > 17/28 0:15 -0.21 1...d4 2.Nb5 d3 3.Kf1 a6 4.Nc7 a5 5.Ke1 Ng4 6.b4 axb4 7.a3 >(9.617.557) 622.3 > 17/36 0:28 -0.20++ 1...Kf8 2.Nb5 a6 3.Nc7 a5 4.b4 axb4 5.Na6 b3 6.axb3 d4 >7.Nb4 dxe3 8.fxe3 Ke7 9.h3 (17.371.294) 615.1 > 17/36 0:30 -0.15 1...Kf8 2.Nb5 a6 3.Nc7 a5 4.b4 axb4 5.Na6 b3 6.axb3 Ke7 >7.Nc5 Kd6 8.b4 Kc6 9.f3 (18.831.561) 615.1 > 18/38 0:38 -0.30 1...Kf8 2.Nb5 a6 3.Nc7 a5 4.Na6 d4 5.Nc5 dxe3 6.fxe3 Ng4 >7.Nb7 Nxe3 8.Nxa5 Nd5 9.Kf2 Ke7 10.Nc4 f6 (23.775.292) 613.6 > 18/38 1:15 -0.29++ 1...a6 2.Kf1 Kf8 3.Ke2 Ke7 4.b4 Kd6 5.b5 axb5 6.Nxb5+ Kc5 >7.a4 Nd7 8.Nc3 Kc4 9.Nb1 Nc5 10.a5 g5 (45.967.812) 606.0 > 18/38 1:22 -0.28 1...a6 2.Kf1 Kf8 3.Ke2 Ke7 4.b4 Kd6 5.b5 axb5 6.Nxb5+ Kc6 >7.Nc3 d4 8.Nd1 Kc5 9.f3 Kb5 10.Kd3 g5 (50.067.449) 606.3 > 19/46 2:12 -0.36 1...a6 2.b4 Kf8 3.b5 axb5 4.Nxb5 Ke7 5.a4 Kd7 6.a5 Kc6 7.a6 >Nd7 8.Nc3 d4 9.Na4 d3 (80.412.143) 605.9 > 19/46 2:17 -0.35++ 1...Kf8 2.Nb5 a6 3.Nc7 a5 4.Na6 Ke7 5.Nc5 Ne4 6.Nxe4 dxe4 >7.a3 Kd6 8.b4 axb4 9.axb4 Kd5 10.f3 (83.262.130) 605.8 > 19/46 2:26 -0.28 1...Kf8 2.Nb5 a6 3.Nc7 a5 4.Na6 Ke7 5.Nc5 Ne4 6.Nb7 d4 >7.Kf1 Nc3 8.a4 dxe3 9.Ke1 exf2+ 10.Kd2 f1Q (88.901.346) 606.0 >best move: Kg8-f8 time: 3:34.399 min n/s: 603.521 CPU 98.5% nodes: >129.394.467 TB: 18 Diese bewertung ist trotzdem falsch. Weiß steht angesichts eines möglichen Freibauern am Damenflügel besser. Es IST so!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.