Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 00:22:11 07/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 20, 2003 at 17:37:46, Slater Wold wrote:
>On July 20, 2003 at 17:07:20, Ingo Bauer wrote:
>
>>On July 20, 2003 at 16:05:30, Omid David Tabibi wrote:
>>
>>>A very nice game! There are two domains the computers are still weaker than
>>>humans: closed positions (see my yesterday's game against Junior 8), and
>>>endgames (your today's game against Shredder 7.04).
>>>
>>>The decisive blunder of Shredder was at the following position:
>>>[D]6k1/p4pp1/5n2/3pp2p/8/1PN1P3/P4PPP/6K1 b - - 0 23
>>>Here it played 23... d4 which after 24. exd4 exd4 25. Nb5 d3 26. Kf1 a6 27. Nc3
>>
>>Yes a bad move!
>>In analysis mode S7.04 needs 28s on A@2300Mhz with 512 MB Hash. It would need
>>about 56s on a A1200 like the SSDF is using it. With 64MB Hash (like in the game
>>that was played) Shreder needed 5 seconds longer (33s) on my PC.
>
>Also take into account it was playing on a P3 650mhz.
>
>It would have taken probably, 3+ minutes to find it on that hardware.
After converting the game into PGN and publishing it I have cancelled
the database on my P3 650/128 and am therefore unable to say how long
Shredder 7.04 was thinking about its losing move. I am going to try
this position in the analysis mode and will then post the result here.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.