Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:44:21 07/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2003 at 16:02:23, Sherry Washington wrote: >I'm amazed that everyone here seems to take the word of Edward nemeeth and kurt >U for gospel, I mean does anyone know these people personaly? We probably know them a lot better than we know you. > Why do they >deserve so much credibility? If I post a game and say that I won, without any >eyewitness to say that i didn't take any moves back will the game be taken for >fact? I am not saying these gentlemen are lying, but it does seem strange that >these two can accomplish better results then the hundreds of public verified >games we have with grandmasters and masters. I don't think the games are fakes. >I Have several master rated friends >and they get slaughtered everygame, one is rated 2319 and hasn't even drew out >of seven games at 60/ 0 and that was when i had only a 1 gig processor. Apparently, he doesn't know how to play computers. > All i >can say is that I am very sceptical of these gentelman and think their games >should be taken with a grain of salt. Take them with all the salt you want. > Kasparov himself recently said that these >people who are claiming wins against the top programs are full of crap. It happens. I don't think that anticomputer players win all the time or even draw all the time. I think they post their good results and do not post their bad results. Be that as it may, I think that humans do beat computers from time to time.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.