Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 20:47:22 07/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2003 at 23:31:32, Angrim wrote: >On July 21, 2003 at 13:14:05, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >>On July 21, 2003 at 13:07:56, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>I am getting the impression that you do not exactly even understand how many >>>experiments most programmers which have engines of around 500-700 points >>>stronger than yours, are performing. >> >>Oh, really? I'm yet to see those 3100-3300 rated engines...! >> > >Just log in to FICS, and finger ascp. As of this writing it is rated 3100 :) Unfortunately however, the SSDF list contains only engines rated up to 2810, so I assume Vincent has a secret list in his basement; maybe together with some WMO (weapons of move destruction)... >Since this is the only engine on FICS rated 3100-3300 I guess it must be >what he is talking about. Funny thing is, ascp doesn't use null move at >all, since it plays suicide chess where zugzwang is many times more common >than in standard chess. Maybe I should test out this verified null move >thing that I have been hearing about, its supposed to be good with zugz. > >Angrim >warning: this post may have contained humor.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.