Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 08:09:26 07/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2003 at 16:02:23, Sherry Washington wrote: >I'm amazed that everyone here seems to take the word of Edward nemeeth and kurt >U for gospel, I mean does anyone know these people personaly? Why do they >deserve so much credibility? If I post a game and say that I won, without any >eyewitness to say that i didn't take any moves back will the game be taken for >fact? I am not saying these gentlemen are lying, but it does seem strange that >these two can accomplish better results then the hundreds of public verified >games we have with grandmasters and masters. I Have several master rated friends >and they get slaughtered everygame, one is rated 2319 and hasn't even drew out >of seven games at 60/ 0 and that was when i had only a 1 gig processor. All i >can say is that I am very sceptical of these gentelman and think their games >should be taken with a grain of salt. Kasparov himself recently said that these >people who are claiming wins against the top programs are full of crap. You probably only recently started reading forums about computer chess. Otherwise you would know Kurt Utzinger and Eduard Nemeth as Computer chess Experts since a decade and longer. They are interested in computer chess since 10 or 20 years and their knowledge about computer chess is huge. Kasparov and Kramnik didn't play against the engins as they were sold. In these matches their were book experts which chooses opening lines especially against these GMs. Probably neither Kurt and Eduard could score 50% against an engine if there were experts tuning the book and the parameters against them. regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.