Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 10:29:38 07/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 2003 at 12:55:41, George Sobala wrote:
>On July 22, 2003 at 04:05:46, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On July 22, 2003 at 03:16:14, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>what will be the outcome if you play using an Athlon XP 2400+ instead of those
>>>mere P650 MHz? I believe that neither of you could score 30% against Shredder
>>>7.04 UCI or Fritz 8.008.
>>>
>>>Pichard
>>
>> Hi Jorge
>> I have played the following games at time control 120'/40
>> - vs Junior8 [1/2, 1/2, 0]
>> - vs ChessTiger15 [1/2, 1/2]
>> - vs Shredder 7.04 [1, 1/2]
>> sometimes using P3/650 and sometimes P3/800. In short: much too less
>> games to say anything. But if you looking at the games, there would be
>> not much difference with a Ath XP 2400+ except the game vs Shredder704
>> when the program on the much faster hardware would have avoided the
>> losing move ... d4. In all the other [boring] games there was no tactics
>> and other moves would hardly have changed the drawn result. I can't speak
>> for Eduard Nemeth who is playing completely different to my style, but as
>> long I succeed in getting absolute equal positions [and this is of course
>> not always possible] from the opening with not much tension in it, I can
>> imagine to score 30 % vs all top programs. Don't lough but I think that
>> today's programs play positionally too sound and I guess my results would
>> be much worse vs older chess programs like MChessPro, Gandalf (DOS) or
>> Kallisto.
>> Kurt
>
>... or Deep Sjeng using the "redshift" personality, perhaps. Redshift will
>strive to make the position non-boring, I assure you!
Not a bad idea. I will give it perhaps a trial too.
Kurt
This page took 2.88 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.