Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:04:01 07/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 2003 at 15:09:13, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On July 22, 2003 at 14:54:48, Rajen Gupta wrote: > >You are comparing x86 executables here. >That's like running 8 bits XT executables at the P4. > >Do you understand that? > >If not then it is useless to say that things will change for chess software a >lot when there is native good x86-64 compilers for opteron (and future intel >x86-64 platforms which does *not* include that 3.06Ghz Xeon MP). > >Note that the 3.06Ghz Xeon MP you show there is about $5000 a piece. spending >$16000 to get 4 of them is pretty expensive therefore. 4 * $5000 == $16000? strange math. > >Also note that most of the benchmarks are not close to how chessprogs react onto >extra registers and such. > >>the second graph on this page: >> >>http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1818&p=5 >> >>(general usage performance; business winstone 2002) >> >>and the 3rd graph on this page: >> >>http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/opteron-1_19.html >> >>Performance: Office and Content Creation Applications >> business winstone 2002 >> >> i have noted these bench marks correlate very well with chess benchmarks;based >>on these the opteron does not seem much better than an athlon xp; infact one of >>aaron's 2400 babies might thrash the opteron pretty badly; >> >>in all other tests the opteron is to put it mildly "pathetic" i doubt that >>anyone will ever want to buy such a system esp when intel has come out with >>this:http://www.gamepc.com/labs/view_content.asp?id=xeon3061MB&page=1
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.