Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 08:40:56 07/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 23, 2003 at 08:44:36, Ed Schröder wrote: >On July 23, 2003 at 07:29:32, Christophe Drieu wrote: > >>Hi Ed, >> >>Why do you choose winboard protocol and not uci protocol ? Many people will run >>Rebel under Chessbase GUI for engines match, and they will use winb2uci. Don't >>you think Native uci engine will be the best (like Lokasoft DeepSjeng) ? Uci >>protocol is really easy to implement. > >Hi Christophe, > >You have diligent programmers and lazy ones, I belong the last category, those >are the best :) But the lazy programmers are precisely the ones who should prefer the UCI protocol. I have implemented both protocols in my program during the last month, and the UCI protocol was by far the easiest one! Tord
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.