Author: Christophe Drieu
Date: 09:00:10 07/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 23, 2003 at 11:40:56, Tord Romstad wrote: >On July 23, 2003 at 08:44:36, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On July 23, 2003 at 07:29:32, Christophe Drieu wrote: >> >>>Hi Ed, >>> >>>Why do you choose winboard protocol and not uci protocol ? Many people will run >>>Rebel under Chessbase GUI for engines match, and they will use winb2uci. Don't >>>you think Native uci engine will be the best (like Lokasoft DeepSjeng) ? Uci >>>protocol is really easy to implement. >> >>Hi Christophe, >> >>You have diligent programmers and lazy ones, I belong the last category, those >>are the best :) > >But the lazy programmers are precisely the ones who should prefer the UCI >protocol. I have implemented both protocols in my program during the last >month, and the UCI protocol was by far the easiest one! > >Tord Yes, T.rex (my engine) use this protocol for the same case too !
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.