Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What program's performance is more impressive against humans?

Author: Kurt Utzinger

Date: 07:47:58 07/24/03

Go up one level in this thread


On July 24, 2003 at 10:37:45, emerson tan wrote:

>The last 3 man versus machines is hard to compare because of different match
>conditions.
>
>Deep Fritz used 900Mhz 8 way Xeon, ISNT allowed to change its engine parameters
>and Kramnik was given the exact program 6 months in advance. The match was
>drawn.
>
>Deep Junior used 1900Mhz 4 way Xeon (this is what I remembered)  Kasparov got to
>play the program before the match (although not that big significance since
>whatever Garry observed about the program's weakness and style cannot be
>guaranteed that it will be repeated since the program's engine parameters was
>allowed to be changed every game. The match was drawn.
>
>Hiarcs used "only" one 2.4Ghz Athlon, I dont know if its allowed to change its
>engine parameters. I dont think Bareev got a copy before the match. The match
>was drawn.
>
>Which program do you think has the most impressive performance?

     Only considering the hardware, it must be Hiarcs X to have achieved the
     best performance.
     Kurt



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.