Author: Joe McCarro
Date: 08:13:13 07/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
Do you think the style of play of each player should be taken into account? Perhaps Fritz had the best result then. IMO Kramnik or Leko have the best chances of beating computers in Match play. How many ply deeper did this faster hardware allow each to go? Also should we consider other matches such as the Gulko or Smirin matches even though it was a different version of the software? On July 24, 2003 at 10:47:58, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On July 24, 2003 at 10:37:45, emerson tan wrote: > >>The last 3 man versus machines is hard to compare because of different match >>conditions. >> >>Deep Fritz used 900Mhz 8 way Xeon, ISNT allowed to change its engine parameters >>and Kramnik was given the exact program 6 months in advance. The match was >>drawn. >> >>Deep Junior used 1900Mhz 4 way Xeon (this is what I remembered) Kasparov got to >>play the program before the match (although not that big significance since >>whatever Garry observed about the program's weakness and style cannot be >>guaranteed that it will be repeated since the program's engine parameters was >>allowed to be changed every game. The match was drawn. >> >>Hiarcs used "only" one 2.4Ghz Athlon, I dont know if its allowed to change its >>engine parameters. I dont think Bareev got a copy before the match. The match >>was drawn. >> >>Which program do you think has the most impressive performance? > > Only considering the hardware, it must be Hiarcs X to have achieved the > best performance. > Kurt
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.