Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 11:27:32 07/25/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 25, 2003 at 07:28:52, Stefan Dias wrote: >On July 25, 2003 at 05:47:31, Milorad Madjar wrote: > >>About Tournament- 7/03, 60 min +2 sec - finished: >> >>First : sorry for my English. >> >>I'm repeat: >>My intention is not than you said ,I want see how the best (for me) The King >>settings playing between itself and together with the best another chess >>programes (The King 5 with 7 other chess programes) and some chess programes >>(Ktulu, ....) as surprise. >> >>and >> >>You can find similar tournament in the forum , where you have 4 or 5 CRAFTY >>(CRAFTY 19.03 Capablanca,....) settings and I don't see any problem about that. >> >>and >> >>the first 5 The King settings have total 37 point's, the rest (best) 5 world >>chess programs have 30 point's : >>The King 3.23 37 point -- (Junior 8,Fritz 8,...) 30 point. >>Result is clear. >> >>and >> >>If I use only my settings ,The King 3.23M2v.5, you can say for me ...selfish. >>because that I use another settings (perhaps better than my). >>All the same, I think that The King 3.23 have big potential If we change some >>parameteres than in original settings.Resultantes of many chess enthusiast say >>that. >>Only time ,how The King use, stay as big defect for this chess program. >>The King don't know to arrange time in the game and it is big defect for this >>excellent chess program. >> >>Regards >>Milan > > >You are completely right. Many people are confused with many versions of the >same engine. To turn things clearer let´s rename them to Engine A, Engine B, >Engine C.... and let those engines play the tournament. > >On the other hand all 5 TheKing engines got 37 points, and 5 other best placed >engines got 30 pints. This arguments is the strongest one. And this fact really >reflects the real relation of forces. > >The only remark I have is that I prefer one or two round robin tournament. You need literally hundreds of games between this small of a pool of opponents before you can make a substantial judgement. IMO-YMMV. Some people say that they can watch a single move by a program and judge how strong it is. I'm not one of those people.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.