Author: Milorad Madjar
Date: 12:28:48 07/25/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 25, 2003 at 14:27:32, Dann Corbit wrote: >On July 25, 2003 at 07:28:52, Stefan Dias wrote: > >>On July 25, 2003 at 05:47:31, Milorad Madjar wrote: >> >>>About Tournament- 7/03, 60 min +2 sec - finished: >>> >>>First : sorry for my English. >>> >>>I'm repeat: >>>My intention is not than you said ,I want see how the best (for me) The King >>>settings playing between itself and together with the best another chess >>>programes (The King 5 with 7 other chess programes) and some chess programes >>>(Ktulu, ....) as surprise. >>> >>>and >>> >>>You can find similar tournament in the forum , where you have 4 or 5 CRAFTY >>>(CRAFTY 19.03 Capablanca,....) settings and I don't see any problem about that. >>> >>>and >>> >>>the first 5 The King settings have total 37 point's, the rest (best) 5 world >>>chess programs have 30 point's : >>>The King 3.23 37 point -- (Junior 8,Fritz 8,...) 30 point. >>>Result is clear. >>> >>>and >>> >>>If I use only my settings ,The King 3.23M2v.5, you can say for me ...selfish. >>>because that I use another settings (perhaps better than my). >>>All the same, I think that The King 3.23 have big potential If we change some >>>parameteres than in original settings.Resultantes of many chess enthusiast say >>>that. >>>Only time ,how The King use, stay as big defect for this chess program. >>>The King don't know to arrange time in the game and it is big defect for this >>>excellent chess program. >>> >>>Regards >>>Milan >> >> >>You are completely right. Many people are confused with many versions of the >>same engine. To turn things clearer let´s rename them to Engine A, Engine B, >>Engine C.... and let those engines play the tournament. >> >>On the other hand all 5 TheKing engines got 37 points, and 5 other best placed >>engines got 30 pints. This arguments is the strongest one. And this fact really >>reflects the real relation of forces. >> >>The only remark I have is that I prefer one or two round robin tournament. > >You need literally hundreds of games between this small of a pool of opponents >before you can make a substantial judgement. > >IMO-YMMV. > >Some people say that they can watch a single move by a program and judge how >strong it is. I'm not one of those people. Hi Dan, Result of Tournament- 7/03, 60 min +2 sec is result only of this tournament. And what I say is the judgement about this tournament , and 78 games in this tournament .Maybe 2000 games or raundes not enough for some people, maybe thay want 4000 games or roundes ..... On World Cup ,or any other tournment on the world ...., we have fixed number of games and winner is victor of this tournament and you or I or anybody can make a judgement only about this tournament.We don't know what can happen after 200 games or 2000 .... And we must congratulate to winner in this moment. Maybe you not arrange about condition , but I'm explain about that in the past. Regars Milan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.