Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 14:41:05 07/25/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 25, 2003 at 15:28:48, Milorad Madjar wrote: [snip] >Hi Dan, >Result of Tournament- 7/03, 60 min +2 sec is result only of this tournament. >And what I say is the judgement about this tournament , and 78 games in this >tournament .Maybe 2000 games or raundes not enough for some people, maybe thay >want 4000 games or roundes ..... >On World Cup ,or any other tournment on the world ...., we have fixed number of >games and winner is victor of this tournament and you or I or anybody can make a >judgement only about this tournament.We don't know what can happen after 200 >games or 2000 .... And we must congratulate to winner in this moment. >Maybe you not arrange about condition , but I'm explain about that in the past. And there is nothing wrong with a contest with as many or as few games as we like. After all, a contest determines something: A winner. That does not mean that the winner was the strongest. But it does mean that the winner won that particular contest. That in itself is always interesting. The problems arise when we try to read to much into a given result. IMO-YMMV.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.