Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:02:46 07/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 27, 2003 at 05:14:20, Sune Fischer wrote: >On July 27, 2003 at 02:44:02, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>> >>>FRC is actually more complicated than standard chess. If you studied chess for >>>15 years and don't wish to play FRC, thats fine, no one is forcing you to. For >>>some, FRC is a new challenge and offers more fun. Let each choose their own >>>path :) >> >> Just my opinion although I do not play FRC. For me, the standard >> and classic chess is complicated enough. >> Kurt > >It is definitely complicated :) > >But in chess, as it is today, the main preparation goes into memorizing opening >lines, and for the best players a lot of time is spent (I think) analysing with >computers to find new novelties to surprize their opponents with. > >So in a way, some of the game, maybe even the critical part of the game, does >not take place at the board, but at home in preparation. > >Who can honestly say they find that amusing? > >-S. It may be the case for the best players but I believe that at least for players who are not the best players theory is not very important(if they use a lot of their time for learning theory then they do a mistake because it is not the best way to improve). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.