Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Which engine is the better attacker?

Author: Kurt Utzinger

Date: 14:04:14 07/27/03

Go up one level in this thread


On July 27, 2003 at 09:59:50, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On July 27, 2003 at 06:12:00, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On July 26, 2003 at 20:22:51, Alex  wrote:
>>
>>>Junior 8 or a chess tiger?  Orrrrrrrrrrr should I just stick with CM 9000 until
>>>the "9" versions come out?   Opinions?
>>
>>     According to the results of the WM-Test, king's attack we have
>>     rank 1,  sp 32 = Fritz 7b (v7006)
>>     rank 2,  sp 32 = Fritz 7a (v7002)
>>     rank 3,  sp 31 = Deep Fritz 7
>>     rank 4,  sp 32 = Fritz 7d (v7008)
>>     rank 5,  sp 31 = Fritz 7c (v7006)
>>     rank 6,  sp 31 = CM9 Pillen
>>     rank 38, sp 28 = Junior 8
>>     rank 126 sp 126 = Chess Tiger 15
>>
>>     Kurt
>
>
>
>What does this test suite actually test?
>
>Ability to find the mate from a King attack position (a position where a King is
>already under severe attack) or the ability to create a King attack from a
>balanced, quiet position?
>
>If the answer is the first one, this does not answer Alex' question at all...
>
>
>
>    Christophe


     I have not studied the corresponding positions. I just put the ranking
     list of the WM-Test in this forum. Under the circumstances it is beyond
     my control to interprete this list.
     Kurt



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.