Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 05:58:22 07/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2003 at 08:53:39, Andrew Williams wrote: >On July 28, 2003 at 03:36:45, Eugene Nalimov wrote: > >>On July 28, 2003 at 03:24:37, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >> >>>Vincent's postings and threads are instructive, informative, entertaining, >>>controverse, none diplomatic, unrespectful and sometimes rude. >>>I don't want to miss him here. >>> >>>Gerd >> >>Yes, Vincent's posts are very informative, indeed. How else can I found that I >>am the "fucking idiot"? And yes, it's very interesting to read year after year >>how Vincent's program almost beat the opponent -- but draw or lost due to one >>reason or other... >> >>Thanks, >>Eugene > >I think that Vincent's attacks tend to reveal more about Vincent than about his >intended target. > >Andrew Agreed, but when a person is taking shots at someone in a thread that is not even in the discussion there is a problem. That is a vendetta. And that should not be tolerated. In fact Vincent in one of the posts that I listed attacked Uri, and Robert. Robert was not even in the conversation.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.