Author: Andrew Williams
Date: 07:12:47 07/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2003 at 08:58:22, Peter Skinner wrote: >On July 28, 2003 at 08:53:39, Andrew Williams wrote: > >>On July 28, 2003 at 03:36:45, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >> >>>On July 28, 2003 at 03:24:37, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >>> >>>>Vincent's postings and threads are instructive, informative, entertaining, >>>>controverse, none diplomatic, unrespectful and sometimes rude. >>>>I don't want to miss him here. >>>> >>>>Gerd >>> >>>Yes, Vincent's posts are very informative, indeed. How else can I found that I >>>am the "fucking idiot"? And yes, it's very interesting to read year after year >>>how Vincent's program almost beat the opponent -- but draw or lost due to one >>>reason or other... >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Eugene >> >>I think that Vincent's attacks tend to reveal more about Vincent than about his >>intended target. >> >>Andrew > >Agreed, but when a person is taking shots at someone in a thread that is not >even in the discussion there is a problem. That is a vendetta. And that should >not be tolerated. > >In fact Vincent in one of the posts that I listed attacked Uri, and Robert. >Robert was not even in the conversation. I don't think it's necessary to ban Vincent, and I don't think that your thread was necessary or appropriate. If you want to complain about another member, the right thing to do is to email the moderators. I probably shouldn't have posted in the thread either. Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.