Author: Chessfun
Date: 08:02:41 07/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2003 at 10:12:47, Andrew Williams wrote: >On July 28, 2003 at 08:58:22, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On July 28, 2003 at 08:53:39, Andrew Williams wrote: >> >>>On July 28, 2003 at 03:36:45, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >>> >>>>On July 28, 2003 at 03:24:37, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >>>> >>>>>Vincent's postings and threads are instructive, informative, entertaining, >>>>>controverse, none diplomatic, unrespectful and sometimes rude. >>>>>I don't want to miss him here. >>>>> >>>>>Gerd >>>> >>>>Yes, Vincent's posts are very informative, indeed. How else can I found that I >>>>am the "fucking idiot"? And yes, it's very interesting to read year after year >>>>how Vincent's program almost beat the opponent -- but draw or lost due to one >>>>reason or other... >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>>Eugene >>> >>>I think that Vincent's attacks tend to reveal more about Vincent than about his >>>intended target. >>> >>>Andrew >> >>Agreed, but when a person is taking shots at someone in a thread that is not >>even in the discussion there is a problem. That is a vendetta. And that should >>not be tolerated. >> >>In fact Vincent in one of the posts that I listed attacked Uri, and Robert. >>Robert was not even in the conversation. > >I don't think it's necessary to ban Vincent, and I don't think that your thread >was necessary or appropriate. If you want to complain about another member, the >right thing to do is to email the moderators. I probably shouldn't have posted >in the thread either. Neither should I and I've been avoiding it, but this thread is nothing but a troll. And the original poster should be censored IMHO. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.