Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 13:48:18 07/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2003 at 12:41:00, Mike Byrne wrote: >This is not the proper place for this discussion. However, since you went >public with this request I will go public with our response. > >The moderators received your email requesting the banning of Vince. We took it >under consideration and there was no interest in approving your request. > >The points below may not reflect all the moderators - but they do reflect mine. > >======================================================================= > >Vince does not use foul language. > >He generally attacks ideas and not people. Good to know that calling others liars and idiots is considered attacking ideas. P.S. I don't think Vincent should be banned. > >I agree with you that Vince is at times on the edge, but he somehow manages to >stay on the right side of the line. If we were to ban Vince, we would have to >consider banning a number of contributors as well - including myself. > >Not everyone here will always be as polite and considerate as Dan Andersson , >Tony Hedlund or Alastair Scott, just to name a few our polite and considerate >members. > >If Vince was perhaps a little bit more obnoxious, posted constantly in CAPS and >made his attacks a little more personal - my view of the situation could change. > > >======================================================================== > >A suggestion for Vince , I would just "tone" it down a bit. > >======================================================================== > >Best, > >Michael Byrne >Moderator
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.