Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 15:55:13 07/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2003 at 18:41:19, Dan Andersson wrote: > Forth, Scheme or OCaml. Forth is an old love. In university I never liked languages like Prolog or Scheme (although I liked Scheme more than Prolog). I used to compare these languages to C/C++, as riding a donkey to driving a Mercedes :) > As for functional languages: > They are easy to work with, interactive. And functional languages are IMO fast >enough now. ML laguages are as fast as C or faster for may applictions. And the >type system and relative side effect free nature of them is appealing. > And it seems reasonably easy to add Partially Ordered Sets in them. POS is one >of the key issues in my current chess/game algorithm thinking. > >MvH Dan Andersson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.