Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 16:00:41 07/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2003 at 18:26:29, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >References, function inlining and namespaces are enaugh to use C++. Gerd, references is enough for me, to avoid C++. In the "old days", when I read code with a function call, like foo(a), I was sure, that a will be the same after the function call, than before. With C++, I cannot be sure anymore. If I want to make a changable by a function call, I use &a in C. All pretty much self documenting. Not anymore in C++. It may even be a performance issue. I read your suggestion about the small inline functions vs. macros. I basically agree. But when using reference paramaters (your example did), things might be very different. This might make it very difficult or even impossible to make a good optimization for the compiler. Function inlining is part of the ISO C Standard of 1999. Not all compilers support it. Regards, Dieter
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.