Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 06:38:30 07/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 29, 2003 at 06:12:34, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On July 28, 2003 at 19:00:41, Dieter Buerssner wrote: > >>On July 28, 2003 at 18:26:29, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >> >>>References, function inlining and namespaces are enaugh to use C++. >> >>Gerd, references is enough for me, to avoid C++. In the "old days", when I read >>code with a function call, like foo(a), I was sure, that a will be the same >>after the function call, than before. With C++, I cannot be sure anymore. > >But shouldn't the fact that in C++ things like "a=b+c" or "d->e" can do many >more things than a sane mind would expect them to do make up for it again? :) Absolutely, operator overloading rocks. Just try working with vectors and matrices in C :o -S. >Sargon
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.