Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 09:51:54 07/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 29, 2003 at 12:17:36, Dimitris Poulos wrote:
>On July 29, 2003 at 11:05:21, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On July 29, 2003 at 10:47:45, Dimitris Poulos wrote:
>>
>>>Wy don't you try another CM setting wich is much more stronger?
>>>Well the SKR doesn't have that good results against profesionals. I Think
>>>Milorad's M2v5 is the best.Or perhaps mine: you can find it in Axel's page.
>>>
>>>Dimitris
>>
>> Give me a proof of 500-900 games, 40'/40 or higher, see
>> http://www.utzingerkurt.com/cm9_skr_report.htm that the
>> settings stated above are stronger than SKR. And secondly: I think
>> that M2v5 as well as your settings do not base on a possible
>> original CM9-setting. That's the reason why I have never tested it
>> because I want to know what I am testing.
>> Kurt
>
>Well my setting IS an original CM9 setting. And the fact that you run a lot of
>games doesn't make your setting better of course! Anyway I admire your
>minimalistic utz12 settings.
>Regards
>Dimitris
Hi Dimitris
In that case, sorry if we have missed to test your settings.
It's true: the fact that we run a lot of games does not necessarly
mean that SKR is better than your setting. But 900 games have some
statistical worth you can't claim with - let's say - 30 games
at longer time control. And the fact that CM9 Dimitris might be
very strong at blitz does not say much about its behaviour at
longer time controls. If you can give me some evidence that
CM9 Dimitris has played at least 100 (better 200) games at longer
time control with good results, we shall start testing your setting.
There are so many CM9-settings on the market, that we simply do
not find the time to test them all. And for this reason we need
at first some good results [40'/40 or higher]. Only this will
encourage us to start testing.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.