Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 10:39:48 07/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 29, 2003 at 09:38:30, Sune Fischer wrote: >On July 29, 2003 at 06:12:34, Daniel Clausen wrote: > >>On July 28, 2003 at 19:00:41, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >> >>>On July 28, 2003 at 18:26:29, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >>> >>>>References, function inlining and namespaces are enaugh to use C++. >>> >>>Gerd, references is enough for me, to avoid C++. In the "old days", when I read >>>code with a function call, like foo(a), I was sure, that a will be the same >>>after the function call, than before. With C++, I cannot be sure anymore. >> >>But shouldn't the fact that in C++ things like "a=b+c" or "d->e" can do many >>more things than a sane mind would expect them to do make up for it again? :) > >Absolutely, operator overloading rocks. >Just try working with vectors and matrices in C :o That's on the one hand. On the other hand, there is nothing worse than operator overloading gone bad. And I really mean it.
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.