Author: Pham Hong Nguyen
Date: 20:31:24 07/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
Congratulation! Btw, could you post the new number here as a reference? Thanks. On July 29, 2003 at 14:35:45, Rick Bischoff wrote: >Fixed. I feel so dumb-- the problem was with the way my moves are encoded... If >say we reached two positions that are identical but used different pieces (say a >rook on A1 as opposed to one on H1) to get there, the hashmove would point to a >non-existant piece. > >Thanks all! >Rick > >On July 29, 2003 at 03:44:42, Rick Bischoff wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>I am getting the following statistic from my program: >> >><pre> >> 0/18 0 1426407 Ke6 h3 Kd5 Rg2 Kc5 h4 Kb5 h5 Ka5 h6 Ka6 >>move found: 85570 not found: 118 >></pre> >> >>Which means of the 88570 times the hashtable didn't have a good value, it still >>had a good move to try first; the other 118 times it didnt have a good value, >>it had an illegal move... Is this the kind of percentage you all see in your >>engines?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.