Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:41:50 07/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 31, 2003 at 08:27:55, Slater Wold wrote: >On July 31, 2003 at 02:45:21, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On July 30, 2003 at 18:50:33, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>Time Control = 5/5 >>>Shreder 7.04 - Dual P4 3.06Ghz - +3 -15 =1 (10 loses on time) >>>Deep Fritz 7 - Dual AMD 2.3Ghz - +1 -8 =3 (11 loses on time) >>>Time Control = 15/5 >>>Deep Fritz 7 - Dual AMD 2.3Ghz - +0 -0 =1 >> >> >>Slate, >> >>You have been playing this under Chesspartner I assume? >> >>I have no idea, everything looks fine here but I haven't played Rebel on ICC >>yet. Maybe it is related to the permanent brain, that wouldn't be the first time >>and you should turn off pondering for this version playing ICC. >> >> >>>Total of 12 hours on ICC = +4 -23 =5 (And 23 loses on time.) >> >>That must have been frustrating for you :) >> >>Anyway, thanks for pointing this out. >> >>Ed >> >> >>>Games will follow. > >Using 200MB hash, I haven't lost on time in 15 games. > >I think using 400MB hash is what was locking up the search. > >I have 1GB of RAM, but....it does seem that the hash was the problem. > >And now it's not losing on time, and doing much better against it's opponents. >:) 400 MB hash in a blitz game! That is always going to be a problem. Even if it could move on time, it's going to play crappy. Think of how long it takes to clear out 400 MB of memory.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.