Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:41:50 07/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 31, 2003 at 08:27:55, Slater Wold wrote: >On July 31, 2003 at 02:45:21, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On July 30, 2003 at 18:50:33, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>Time Control = 5/5 >>>Shreder 7.04 - Dual P4 3.06Ghz - +3 -15 =1 (10 loses on time) >>>Deep Fritz 7 - Dual AMD 2.3Ghz - +1 -8 =3 (11 loses on time) >>>Time Control = 15/5 >>>Deep Fritz 7 - Dual AMD 2.3Ghz - +0 -0 =1 >> >> >>Slate, >> >>You have been playing this under Chesspartner I assume? >> >>I have no idea, everything looks fine here but I haven't played Rebel on ICC >>yet. Maybe it is related to the permanent brain, that wouldn't be the first time >>and you should turn off pondering for this version playing ICC. >> >> >>>Total of 12 hours on ICC = +4 -23 =5 (And 23 loses on time.) >> >>That must have been frustrating for you :) >> >>Anyway, thanks for pointing this out. >> >>Ed >> >> >>>Games will follow. > >Using 200MB hash, I haven't lost on time in 15 games. > >I think using 400MB hash is what was locking up the search. > >I have 1GB of RAM, but....it does seem that the hash was the problem. > >And now it's not losing on time, and doing much better against it's opponents. >:) 400 MB hash in a blitz game! That is always going to be a problem. Even if it could move on time, it's going to play crappy. Think of how long it takes to clear out 400 MB of memory.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.