Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 16:28:37 07/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 31, 2003 at 19:21:24, Slater Wold wrote: >A *lot* less loses on time. Going from 400MB to 200MB HTs seems to improve >things. All games were played with Rebel using a P4 3.06Ghz. > > >Time control = 5/3 > >DANIEL1971* = +3 -0 =1 > >Shredder 7.04 (2xAMD-O 1.6Ghz) = +0 -0 =1 > >CT 15 (P4 1.8Ghz) = +2 -2 =0 (2 loses on time; not included in result) > >Time Control = 5/5 > >CM9000 (P4 2.4Ghz) = +0 -0 =2 > >Time Control = 5/12 > >Shredder 6.02 (P3 1Ghz) = +0 -1 =1 > >Time Control = 10/5 > >PERFECTCHESS* = +2 -4 =0 > > >TOTAL = +7 -7 =5 (6 loses on time; not included in result) > >Games will follow. > > >*Indicates the players name on ICC; both used the 'Blitzin' interface, but did >not reveal what engine or hardware they were using. Slate, Assuming you are playing with the latest update, check the file PARAM.TXT while playing. In there you will find a line "Time till next Time Control", the time mentioned in that line should match the ICC clock. I don't think the problem is related to the hash table size. My best, Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.