Author: Slater Wold
Date: 16:29:14 07/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 31, 2003 at 18:41:50, Dann Corbit wrote: >On July 31, 2003 at 08:27:55, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On July 31, 2003 at 02:45:21, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>On July 30, 2003 at 18:50:33, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >>>>Time Control = 5/5 >>>>Shreder 7.04 - Dual P4 3.06Ghz - +3 -15 =1 (10 loses on time) >>>>Deep Fritz 7 - Dual AMD 2.3Ghz - +1 -8 =3 (11 loses on time) >>>>Time Control = 15/5 >>>>Deep Fritz 7 - Dual AMD 2.3Ghz - +0 -0 =1 >>> >>> >>>Slate, >>> >>>You have been playing this under Chesspartner I assume? >>> >>>I have no idea, everything looks fine here but I haven't played Rebel on ICC >>>yet. Maybe it is related to the permanent brain, that wouldn't be the first time >>>and you should turn off pondering for this version playing ICC. >>> >>> >>>>Total of 12 hours on ICC = +4 -23 =5 (And 23 loses on time.) >>> >>>That must have been frustrating for you :) >>> >>>Anyway, thanks for pointing this out. >>> >>>Ed >>> >>> >>>>Games will follow. >> >>Using 200MB hash, I haven't lost on time in 15 games. >> >>I think using 400MB hash is what was locking up the search. >> >>I have 1GB of RAM, but....it does seem that the hash was the problem. >> >>And now it's not losing on time, and doing much better against it's opponents. >>:) > >400 MB hash in a blitz game! > >That is always going to be a problem. Even if it could move on time, it's going >to play crappy. > >Think of how long it takes to clear out 400 MB of memory. On a P4? Not long. But Rebel uses a swap file, which is probably a bit of a problem. Even on an U320 SCSI drive.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.