Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 16:36:45 07/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 31, 2003 at 19:32:03, Slater Wold wrote:
>On July 31, 2003 at 19:28:37, Ed Schröder wrote:
>
>>On July 31, 2003 at 19:21:24, Slater Wold wrote:
>>
>>>A *lot* less loses on time. Going from 400MB to 200MB HTs seems to improve
>>>things. All games were played with Rebel using a P4 3.06Ghz.
>>>
>>>
>>>Time control = 5/3
>>>
>>>DANIEL1971* = +3 -0 =1
>>>
>>>Shredder 7.04 (2xAMD-O 1.6Ghz) = +0 -0 =1
>>>
>>>CT 15 (P4 1.8Ghz) = +2 -2 =0 (2 loses on time; not included in result)
>>>
>>>Time Control = 5/5
>>>
>>>CM9000 (P4 2.4Ghz) = +0 -0 =2
>>>
>>>Time Control = 5/12
>>>
>>>Shredder 6.02 (P3 1Ghz) = +0 -1 =1
>>>
>>>Time Control = 10/5
>>>
>>>PERFECTCHESS* = +2 -4 =0
>>>
>>>
>>>TOTAL = +7 -7 =5 (6 loses on time; not included in result)
>>>
>>>Games will follow.
>>>
>>>
>>>*Indicates the players name on ICC; both used the 'Blitzin' interface, but did
>>>not reveal what engine or hardware they were using.
>>
>>
>>Slate,
>>
>>Assuming you are playing with the latest update, check the file PARAM.TXT while
>>playing. In there you will find a line "Time till next Time Control", the time
>>mentioned in that line should match the ICC clock.
>>
>>I don't think the problem is related to the hash table size.
>>
>>My best,
>>
>>Ed
>
>
>The last game I played, I lost on time. Here's the game:
>
>[Event "ICC 5 10"]
>[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
>[Date "2003.07.31"]
>[Round "-"]
>[White "freeindeed"]
>[Black "Project"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[ICCResult "Black forfeits on time"]
>[WhiteElo "2604"]
>[BlackElo "2718"]
>[Opening "QGD Slav defense, Alekhine variation"]
>[ECO "A11"]
>[NIC "EO.64"]
>[Time "19:06:05"]
>[TimeControl "300+10"]
>
>1. c4 c6 2. Nc3 d5 3. d4 dxc4 4. e4 b5 5. a4 Bd7 6. Nf3 e6 7. Be2 Nf6 8. O-O
>a5 9. Bg5 Be7 10. Ne5 O-O 11. Qc2 {Black forfeits on time} 1-0
>
>
>
>And here's the param.txt:
>
>
>
>Personality Path C:\Program
>Files\Lokasoft\ChessPartner5.3\engines\Rebel12pre-release\personal\beta9.eng
>(0)
>Personality description Rebel 12 (beta-9) Further positional tuning
>
>Initial Hash Table Size 200 Mb
>Current Hash Table Size 60 Mb
>
>Move no. : 1
>Mimimum Time : 00:02:52
>Average Time : 00:05:43 (12)
>Maximum Time : 00:00:48
>Spare time : 00:00:00
>
>Time till next Time Control : 02:46:39
^^^^^^^^^
looks bad to me. :) that is a 5 10 game???
Seems to think it is a 3 hour game... no wonder it
loses on time...
>Time Control phase : 0
>
>
>
>
>Hope this helps!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.