Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 16:42:02 07/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 31, 2003 at 15:39:10, George Tsavdaris wrote:
>On July 31, 2003 at 11:41:57, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>On July 31, 2003 at 11:37:02, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>They are not unpopular at all, on the contrary you are one of those few who can
>>beat the top programs using a P600 MHz. I will bet that not even 80% of the CCC
>>members can beat the top programs on a similar processor as the one you are
>>currently using, and the difference between your computer and an athlon 1.2 GHz
>>for blitz is too minimal to matter at all.
>>
>>Congratulations and keep posting your interesting blitz games.
>>
>>PS: I personally think that those who post against your games are a little bit
>>jealous.
>
>I can't beat top engines in P600 MHz in blitz/rapid games right now, but it
>think if i experiment for about a month or two, with a specific program
>in P600 MHz,(this means play 100-200 games until i find weaknesses in their
>game) i could beat it some times. Of course maybe i'll not be so good as Eduart
>Nemeth on this procedure. But i really don't believe he has a winning or drawn
>performance in his games against the engines. He played many many games
>with millions of "take back", and a "take back" is really a cheat and thus
>a lost game.
Dear friend!
I _do not_ play with take back in my games, please believe it me.
Fallows game I would play also:
1. e4 e5 2. d4 exd4 3. Qxd4 Nc6 4. Qe3 Nf6… but Junior played for me surprised
now g6!?
German: das würde mir noch fehlen, dass ich nach vielen Jahren Computerschach
nun anfange Züge zurückzunehmen oh NO!
Dann würde ich ehrlich vorher mit Schach ganz aufhören. Mich selbst (UND FÜR
MICH ALLEIN) befriedigt es nur, wenn ich eine Engine korrekt besiegt habe! Dann
habe ich ein schönes Feeling und freue mich. Alles andere ist Dreck und wie soll
ich mich am Dreck freuen können? Das könnte ich nicht.
[Event "Blitz:10'"]
[Site "MyTown"]
[Date "2003.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Nemeth, Eduard"]
[Black "Junior 8, P600."]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C22"]
[Annotator "Nemeth,Eduard"]
[PlyCount "111"]
[TimeControl "600"]
{64MB, Junior8.ctg, P600
} 1. e4 {0} e5 {0} 2. d4 {1} exd4 {0} 3. Qxd4 {1} Nc6
{0} 4. Qe3 {1} g6 {0} 5. h4 {2} Nf6 {0.46/13 32} 6. Nc3 {2} d6 {0.34/12 17} 7.
h5 {10} Nxh5 {0.16/12 22} 8. Bd2 {2} Bg7 {0.00/13 17} 9. O-O-O {2} O-O {
0.28/13 30} 10. Rxh5 {2} gxh5 {-0.82/11 9} 11. Be2 {7} Qf6 {-0.87/13 9} 12. Nh3
{8} Bg4 {-0.95/12 2} 13. Nf4 {4} Qd4 {-0.98/12 5} 14. Qg3 {3} Qe5 {-0.49/12 10}
15. f3 {3} Be6 {-0.24/12 8} 16. Rh1 {1} a5 {-0.05/12 19} 17. Rxh5 {2} Qd4 {
0.08/11 12} 18. Rg5 {33} Kh8 {-0.41/12 19} 19. Bd3 {28} Qg1+ {-1.07/11 20} 20.
Nd1 {2} Be5 {-0.43/11 11} 21. Qh4 {2} Nb4 {0.45/10 9} 22. Bxb4 {7} Rg8 {
3.59/10 17} 23. Rxe5 {9} dxe5 {5.11/12 12} 24. Bc3 {2} Rxg2 {4.87/11 8} 25.
Nxg2 {15} Qxg2 {4.91/13 1} 26. Bxe5+ {2} Kg8 {4.84/13 9} 27. Qf6 {1} Kf8 {
4.84/11 2} 28. f4 {48} Qg6 {3.98/13 11} 29. Qh8+ {25} Qg8 {3.75/15 14} 30.
Qxg8+ {1} Kxg8 {3.76/15 5} 31. f5 {1} Bd7 {3.73/15 8} 32. Bxc7 {2} h5 {
3.72/15 13} 33. e5 {1} h4 {3.72/15 10} 34. Nf2 {1} Bc6 {3.69/15 8} 35. Kd2 {8}
Bg2 {3.82/14 15} 36. Ke3 {2} h3 {3.91/12 7} 37. Ng4 {3} a4 {4.08/12 4} 38. a3 {
3} Rc8 {3.85/12 7} 39. Bd6 {1} Kh8 {4.23/12 6} 40. e6 {3} fxe6 {4.42/12 4} 41.
fxe6 {2} Kg7 {4.65/13 12} 42. Kf4 {42} b6 {4.93/11 8} 43. Kg3 {8} Bd5 {
5.20/12 1} 44. e7 {2} h2 {5.85/11 10} 45. Kxh2 {1} Bc6 {5.67/11 3} 46. Bf5 {3}
Rh8+ {5.78/12 2} 47. Kg3 {2} Kf7 {5.93/12 4} 48. Kf4 {2} Bb5 {6.07/11 2} 49.
Ne5+ {4} Kg7 {6.21/11 2} 50. Kg5 {5} Be8 {6.44/13 14} 51. Bg6 {17} Bxg6 {
6.89/16 1} 52. Nxg6 {1} Rc8 {6.89/16 6} 53. Ne5 {6} b5 {8.99/16 1} 54. Kf5 {3}
Rh8 {9.54/14 1} 55. Ke6 {1} Re8 {9.77/13 2} 56. Kd7 {1} 1-0
Eduard
PS: Thanks Jorge Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.