Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:34:04 08/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 01, 2003 at 05:22:38, Helmut Conrady wrote: >On August 01, 2003 at 04:50:36, Derek Paquette wrote: > >>On August 01, 2003 at 03:53:23, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On August 01, 2003 at 02:45:28, Derek Paquette wrote: >>> >>>>On July 31, 2003 at 16:21:45, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>Jeff Sonas is wrong Shredder 7.0 could NOT performs at 2755 against a solid >>>>>group of players or single players like GM Seirawan or GM Smirin with this >>>>>machine XP 1600+. It all depends on the experience of the players against >>>>>computer programs NOT just their ratings :-) >>>>> >>>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1089 >>>> >>>>Why the heck are they even using 7.0? >>>>why not use 7.04? >>>>are they trying to give the humans a chance :) >>> >>>Maybe they use 7.0x and call it 7.0 >>>Did someone check if the moves are reproducable by shredder7? >>> >>>Uri >> >>what the hell? I ran all shredder versions for analysis and non could reproduce >>some of the moves, must be an entirely new shredder version >>yay! better to come > >I don t think SMK will not compete with his newest version. > >Helmut I guess you mean his best tested version because I do not think that he is going to compete with a version that he did not test to be better. The question is if SMK is competing or a user of shredder. Reports like "shredder7.0" make the impression that SMK does not compete and if SMK does compete then it is a false report. It is not the first time that chessbase give wrong information so I am not surprised. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.