Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 15:21:19 08/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 01, 2003 at 18:05:13, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On August 01, 2003 at 17:50:53, Slater Wold wrote: > >>Results of Rebel 12.0 (beta9 - anti-gm on 'smart') on a P4 3.06Ghz below: >> >>On August 01, 2003 at 12:46:11, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >> >>>[D]r4rk1/4n1pp/4bb2/3p4/1P1npq2/P1N5/5RPP/1NBQRBK1 b - - 1 22 >>> >>>Radja played 22...Qxf2! here. What do the comps say about that? >> >>00:00:00.1 -8.38 1 14 Qd2 Nxd2 >>00:00:00.1 -2.51 1 100 Qxf2+ Kxf2 >>00:00:00.1 0.91 1 274 Qh4 >>00:00:00.1 0.99 1 295 Qd6 >>00:00:00.1 1.00 1 307 Qc7 >>00:00:00.1 -0.18 2 814 Qc7 Rxf6 Rxf6 Qxd4 >>00:00:00.1 0.61 2 1493 Qh4 a4 >>00:00:00.2 0.71 3 3309 Qh4 Be3 Bg4 >>00:00:00.2 -0.72 4 9386 Qh4 g3 Qg4 Rxf6 Nf3+ >>00:00:00.2 0.14 4 11114 Qc7 Rxf6 Rxf6 Qxd4 Raf8 >>00:00:00.2 -0.18 5 25386 Qc7 Rxf6 Rxf6 Qxd4 Raf8 Be3 >>00:00:00.3 0.04 5 60385 Qxf2+ Kxf2 Nc2 Kg1 Bd4+ Kh1 Nxe1 Qxe1 >>00:00:00.5 0.47 6 212390 Qxf2+ Kxf2 Nb5 Kg1 Nxc3 Qb3 Bd4+ Be3 >>00:00:00.6 0.43 7 317559 Qxf2+ Kxf2 Nb5 Re3 Nxc3 Nxc3 Bxc3+ Kg1 >>00:00:01.0 0.44 8 751538 Qxf2+ Kxf2 Nb5 Re3 Nxc3 Nxc3 Bxc3+ Kg1 >>00:00:01.6 0.36 9 1449276 Qxf2+ Kxf2 Nb5 Kg1 Nxc3 Nxc3 Bxc3 Re3 >>00:00:03.4 0.49 10 3561339 Qxf2+ Kxf2 Nb5 Kg1 Nxc3 Nxc3 Bxc3 Re3 >>00:00:07.0 0.49 11 7952712 Qxf2+ Kxf2 Nb5 Kg1 Nxc3 Nxc3 Bxc3 Re3 >>00:00:20.2 0.80 12 22633585 Qxf2+ Kxf2 Nb5 Kg1 Nxc3 Nxc3 Bxc3 Re3 >>00:00:45.4 0.58 13 53927175 Qxf2+ Kxf2 Nb5 Kg1 Nxc3 Qb3 Nxb1 Qxb1 >>00:01:51.3 0.75 14 131709774 Qxf2+ Kxf2 Nb5 Kg1 Nxc3 Qb3 Nxb1 Qxb1 >> >> >> >>>[D]2r3k1/5rp1/4b3/1P1pBn2/B3p2p/P6P/6P1/4Q1K1 b - - 1 32 >>> >>>Radja played 32...d5! What do the comps say here? >> >>The move is 32...d4! by the way...and it's 22/33 (at ply 15) in Rebel's move >>ordering. If I could ask Radja one question, it would be 'What if Anand had >>played 33. Qxe4? What were your plans? Go for the draw?' Anyway, here's >>Rebel's output on the position: > > >The move 33...d4 is not as good as 33..e3, but it still wins. Ruffian has a hard Oops! The moves should be 32...d4 and 32...e3. >time seeing its value even after playing through a couple moves, but it >eventually sees that it wins. The position after 32..d4 appears to be very >difficult for comps to understand. > > >> >>00:00:00.2 -3.60 1 7 Rc2 Bxc2 >>00:00:00.2 -1.55 1 19 Ne3 Qxe3 >>00:00:00.2 -1.50 1 26 Nd4 Bxd4 >>00:00:00.2 2.25 1 33 e3 >>00:00:00.2 2.44 1 50 g6 >>00:00:00.2 1.69 2 202 g6 Qd2 >>00:00:00.2 1.75 2 348 Rc4 Qd1 >>00:00:00.2 2.16 3 877 Rc4 Bb3 Rc8 >>00:00:00.2 1.78 4 2618 Rc4 Bb3 Rc5 Qf1 >>00:00:00.2 1.81 5 8910 Rc4 Bb3 Rc5 Qb4 Rc1+ Kf2 >>00:00:00.2 1.81 5 17298 Ra8 >>00:00:00.2 2.23 5 18498 Ra8 Qd1 Ne3 Qd4 Nc4 >>00:00:00.2 2.08 6 29953 Ra8 Qd1 Ne3 Qd4 Nf5 Qb6 Rxa4 >>00:00:00.3 1.66 7 67313 Ra8 Qb4 Rfa7 b6 Rxa4 b7 Rxa3 >>00:00:00.5 1.70 7 216441 Rc5 Qa1 Rc4 Bb3 Rc5 a4 Rc8 >>00:00:00.7 1.57 8 413939 Rc5 Qa1 Re7 Qb2 Ra7 Bd1 Rac7 Bxc7 >>00:00:01.3 1.63 9 1010742 Rc5 Qa1 Re7 Qb1 Bd7 Qb2 Re6 Kh2 >>00:00:04.5 1.70 10 3998330 Rc5 Qb1 Bd7 Kh2 >>00:00:08.5 1.70 11 7830062 Rc5 Qb1 e3 Bd1 d4 Bf4 Rc3 Qe4 >>00:00:21.6 1.62 12 20690767 Rc5 Qb1 e3 Bd1 d4 Bf4 Bc4 Qb4 >>00:00:42.5 1.62 12 41038264 e3 >>00:00:44.0 1.62 12 20690767 Rc5 Qb1 e3 Bd1 d4 Bf4 Bc4 Qb4 >>00:01:07.6 1.66 13 65667070 Rc5 b6 e3 Kh2 Bc8 >>00:01:27.6 1.66 13 84106398 e3 >>00:01:47.7 1.91 13 102649128 e3 Qd1 d4 Bc2 Rc5 Bxf5 Rxe5 Bg6 >>00:02:49.8 1.85 14 163708231 e3 Bb3 Re8 Bd1 >> >> >>>[D]2r3k1/5rp1/1P2b3/5n2/BQ5p/P1Bp3P/4p1PK/8 b - - 1 36 >>> >>>Radja played 36...Rxc3! and soon won. Entertaining game! >> >>Interesting here, is that almost all engines want Ng3. And Radja actually >>played Ng3 after RxB-QxR. And if you play RxB-QxR most engines will still want >>Ng3 with almost the same exact score (some will like Ne3). When you're up this >>much, it's hard to make a 'wrong' move. >> >> >>00:00:00.1 0.66 1 14 e1Q Bxe1 >>00:00:00.1 2.32 1 142 Ne3 >>00:00:00.1 2.53 1 198 Rd8 >>00:00:00.1 1.97 2 702 Rd8 Bd2 >>00:00:00.1 2.39 2 1287 Ne3 b7 Nf1+ Kg1 >>00:00:00.1 2.39 2 1529 Rc4 >>00:00:00.2 2.42 2 1779 Rc4 Be8 Rxb4 Bxf7+ Kxf7 axb4 >>00:00:00.2 2.50 3 2794 Rc4 Be8 Re7 >>00:00:00.2 2.33 4 5863 Rc4 Qa5 Nd4 Qa8+ Rc8 >>00:00:00.2 2.33 4 10312 Ne3 >>00:00:00.2 2.67 4 14831 Ne3 Qd4 Nf1+ Kg1 >>00:00:00.2 3.17 5 38071 Ne3 Be1 Rc4 Qb5 Nf1+ Kg1 >>00:00:00.3 3.25 6 128338 Ne3 Be1 Nc2 b7 Nxb4 bxc8Q+ Bxc8 >>00:00:00.8 4.60 7 554467 Ne3 Qd4 Nf1+ Kh1 d2 Bxd2 Nxd2 Qg1 >>00:00:01.3 3.54 8 973056 Ne3 b7 Nf1+ Kg1 d2 bxc8Q+ Bxc8 >>00:00:01.5 4.02 8 1203373 Ng3 b7 Rxb7 Qxb7 Rxc3 Qb8+ Bc8 Qe5 >>00:00:02.0 3.90 9 1671966 Ng3 b7 Rxb7 Qd6 Nf1+ Kg1 Rxc3 Qxe6+ >>00:00:07.9 6.04 10 7310010 Ng3 Qxh4 Nf1+ Kg1 d2 b7 d1Q >>00:00:12.0 6.46 11 11092481 Ng3 b7 Rxb7 Qxb7 Rxc3 Qe7 e1Q >>00:00:16.5 6.46 12 15407299 Ng3 b7 Rxb7 Qxb7 Rxc3 Qe7 >>00:00:33.4 6.26 13 31958548 Ng3 b7 Rxb7 Qxh4 Nf1+ Kg1 Rb1 Be1 >>00:03:23.5 7.06 14 199407108 Ng3 b7 Rxb7 Qxb7 Rxc3 Qe7 e1Q
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.