Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Request for Ed: Rebel with all the Chess knowledge available.

Author: emerson tan

Date: 02:45:42 08/03/03

Go up one level in this thread


On August 03, 2003 at 04:48:46, Jonas Bylund wrote:

>On August 03, 2003 at 04:27:57, emerson tan wrote:
>
>>Request for Ed: Rebel with all the Chess knowledge available.
>>
>>
>>Hello Ed,
>>
>>   I really like Rebel. Could you put in the new Rebel all the available chess
>>knowledge you know as an option to the default engine? You already put an option
>>to increase the chess knowledge in the personality setting, but maybe you still
>>have plenty of chess knowledge you still haven't put into Rebel.
>>
>>  Someone like me wants to anylyze a position overnight or for several days. It
>>doesnt matter to me if it is doing just 1KNS on an AMD 3000+ with all the chess
>>knowledge activated. I want to get as much accurate evaluation as possible since
>>the long thinking time will just take care of the depth. Rebel will be the first
>>to have the most chess knowlege.
>>
>>Thank You.
>
>If indeed that much chessknowledge helps for LONG analysis, i would be very
>interested in this option (in any engine) too.
>
>Jonas


I think more chess knowledge is more beneficial than less in long analysis, you
just have to give it A LOT OF TIME coz maybe its initial analysis is not good
due to slowness.

You are right that other engines should have this option too coz a lot of people
are using chess programs for analysis, especially those amateurs who doesnt
understand much chess as masters. All the top engines are already very good in
tactics, we can readily have that. Now for us amateurs, what we need is a good
evaluation from the chess programs. Of course given enough depth, most chess
programs can give good evaluation, but there are still a lot of positions that
are far beyond the search depth of top engines on the most powerful hardware,
and it is here where chess knowledge is needed. Some engines can still give
misleading evaluation and its dangerous for developing players if they rely on
that evaluation.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.