Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 04:22:47 08/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 03, 2003 at 06:37:45, Jonas Bylund wrote: >The point of Emerson Tan which i find interesting, is that for very long >analysis it would be nice to have a version of program X (besides the default >.exe, .eng etc) that has as much knowledge as could possibly be squeezed into >program X (which in this case could be Rebel, but any srtong engine would do >really). Now this would hurt it's performance in fast games, but what about say >3 days per move or more? > >Jonas the knowledge in programs is often wrong implemented and programmers don't know that the algorithm is not working as it should. often different parts of knowledge wipe out each other, so that putting 3 very good ideas altogether makes the program losing. i doubt that it would make much sense to switch anything on you have. the right tuning is the important thing IMO. if you switch anything ON, the program would IMO play weaker as it is in default.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.