Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 20:36:09 08/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 04, 2003 at 16:33:45, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 04, 2003 at 14:06:26, Dan Andersson wrote: > >> One might argue its objective value. But when it took many games and much >>analysis to get a reasonable defence against it. And one slip is enough to lose >>as black. While white gets lots of time to use the initiative. >> >>MvH > >I remember that I analyzed fxe6 with genius3(p100) and I gave Genius3(white) 30 >minutes per move against 3 minute per move for Genius3(black). > >White got nothing from the opening and black even traded queens and got a >winning endgame. > >Uri The sac is sound, only 10 Grandmasters have played against 7..Nxe6, not counting Kasparov's game against Deep Blue, 7..Nxe6 won 9 out of ten games, I suspect the GM blundered. What this tells me, 7..Nxe6 is very strong and wins, and at worst it draws. I've won many Bullet games with 7..Nxe6 Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.