Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: RK 2003 [120'/60] After 140 games, Comparison of books

Author: Pavel Blokhine

Date: 07:52:28 08/05/03

Go up one level in this thread


On August 05, 2003 at 10:01:52, zeidoun wrote:

>Yes Kurt, the book choice has an important issue in the games result. In my
>little experience, i've already noticed this and i've submitted many questions
>and also many responses in this forum. But the fact is that i'm not Kurt
>Utzinger nor Harald Faber, I'm just Zied Haddad from the chesslovers.
>As i mailed to u i've developed new settings for shredder 7.04 that fit not only
>the blitz time controls but also rapid time controls like 25mn games. This
>superb setting is shredder 7.04_Attack1.2, u will find it in my homepage at:
>http://www.chesslovers.tk/ u have then to check the english page (the other
>pages are for the moment no longer up-dated). You enter then into the tournament
>page u will find the details there. I haven't yet up-dated my page to show you
>how incredible is the strength of this new setting for shredder in 25mn games
>but also in blitz games.
>It won clearly against all the top 10 engines in individual matches (making for
>example 70% of the points against Fritz 8, where shredder 7.04 with his
>beginning settings wins only with a games up). But i've tried an overall
>simultaneous match with the top 25 commercial rated programs (exept the king),
>and i'm surprised with a poor peformance against some oldies programs (shredder
>is rated normally more than 150 points of ELO), this poor performance is due to
>the choice of the opening.
>In my test, i used 5 modified positions from the Nunn1 TestSet. The position
>from which all the programs begin to play rises after 5 or 9 moves. All these
>positions are with equal chances for both parts, none of these positions are
>played with an anti-computer style (for example we choose to only develop our
>paws and our pieces in the third line). My purpose was to ovoid the influence of
>book opening. And all the positions where played with black and white to show
>the real strength of the engines.
>I previously posted a question dealing with the learning option that's delivered
>with shredder or hiarcs, but none has responded to me, i think that's because
>none has thought about this point of view. Wait for the next upate of my site to
>check the games and the rating of this new shredder setting. I think that this
>prooves that not only chessmaster but also shredder could be improved, and i
>think that this is a good point for these programs, because their conceptors
>could give us in the next future a more powerful product. <it not the case of
>fritz that reached out his adult age where the development of newer algorithms
>will be more and more difficult. I also think that the next development of fritz
>could be may be the search for new settings.



Hi!

Can you post those strong settings for Shredder here because I wasn't able to
find then in your site. When I play an engines tournaments on my computer,
Shredder 7.04 doesn't appear to be as strong as SSDF says or as advertised; that
no matter what book I use. Some people even told me that maybe it's because I
need to disable the Huperthreading Technology on my dual Xeon. But I would sure
love to test your settings.

Thanks



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.