Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Can not computers invent sacrifices?

Author: Terry McCracken

Date: 09:01:38 08/05/03

Go up one level in this thread


On August 05, 2003 at 02:44:50, Uri Blass wrote:

>On August 04, 2003 at 23:36:09, Terry McCracken wrote:
>
>>On August 04, 2003 at 16:33:45, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On August 04, 2003 at 14:06:26, Dan Andersson wrote:
>>>
>>>> One might argue its objective value. But when it took many games and much
>>>>analysis to get a reasonable defence against it. And one slip is enough to lose
>>>>as black. While white gets lots of time to use the initiative.
>>>>
>>>>MvH
>>>
>>>I remember that I analyzed fxe6 with genius3(p100) and I gave Genius3(white) 30
>>>minutes per move against 3 minute per move for Genius3(black).
>>>
>>>White got nothing from the opening and black even traded queens and got a
>>>winning endgame.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>The sac is sound, only 10 Grandmasters have played against 7..Nxe6, not counting
>>Kasparov's game against Deep Blue, 7..Nxe6 won 9 out of ten games, I suspect the
>>GM blundered.
>>
>>What this tells me, 7..Nxe6 is very strong and wins, and at worst it draws.
>>
>>I've won many Bullet games with 7..Nxe6
>>
>>Terry
>
>I do not know.
>Maybe the blunder was of the 9 GM's and we need to analyze the relevant games to
>know.
>
>Bob Hyatt also said that an IM beated commercial programs with black in that
>line.
>
>I believe that kasparov was not ready for that line and I could expect him to
>play better later in case of being ready.
>
>He had no prepared lines against it.
>If he did an error of going for that line on purpose(I do not know) than the
>error is different than preparing the line against commercial programs and he
>simply did not believe that the computer is going to sacrifice(possible reasons
>may be believing that the computer is already out of book because it used time
>for previous move or believeing that the line is bad for computers based on
>advice that he got and as a result not believing that deeper blue is going to
>play it).
>
>Uri

Kasparov screwed up. Although with best play a draw may be the result...but a
loss, probably not.

Those comps could utilize Nxe6!, but Deep Blue could! So can I:-)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.