Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 11:16:18 08/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 05, 2003 at 13:02:50, Albert Silver wrote: >On August 05, 2003 at 11:15:41, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On August 05, 2003 at 10:45:41, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >> >>>On August 05, 2003 at 09:53:26, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On August 05, 2003 at 09:24:07, ERIQ wrote: >>>> >>>>>. >>>> >>>> >>>>No. >>> >>>I have to disagree. I have performed a number of experiments and found msvc >>>faster some of the time and gcc faster some of the time. It all depends on a >>>number of factors that are not completely predictable. >>> >>>The experiments consisted of simulataneously dropping CD copies of each compiler >>>from the roof of my home and observing which CD impacted the ground first. They >>>never seemed to impact the ground at exactly the same time, but there was no >>>clear favorite either. >> >> >>:) > >Joking aside, how much slower on average is gcc compared to msvc, and more >importantly what are the final results like between the two? > > Albert For me, using an intel xeon processor, gcc is 20-25% behind MSVC. The Intel compiler is less than 10% slower for me. I can't give numbers for AMD processors.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.