Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 09:09:03 08/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 06, 2003 at 03:13:34, martin fierz wrote: Did you use PGO (profile guided optimizations) with gcc 3.2 ? If not, redo the test. it is here where GCC wins for me from all other compilers at x86 hardware. P3, K7 and p4. >On August 05, 2003 at 13:02:50, Albert Silver wrote: > >>On August 05, 2003 at 11:15:41, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On August 05, 2003 at 10:45:41, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >>> >>>>On August 05, 2003 at 09:53:26, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On August 05, 2003 at 09:24:07, ERIQ wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>No. >>>> >>>>I have to disagree. I have performed a number of experiments and found msvc >>>>faster some of the time and gcc faster some of the time. It all depends on a >>>>number of factors that are not completely predictable. >>>> >>>>The experiments consisted of simulataneously dropping CD copies of each compiler >>>>from the roof of my home and observing which CD impacted the ground first. They >>>>never seemed to impact the ground at exactly the same time, but there was no >>>>clear favorite either. >>> >>> >>>:) >> >>Joking aside, how much slower on average is gcc compared to msvc, and more >>importantly what are the final results like between the two? >> >> Albert > >i once compiled my checkers program with both GCC 3.2 and MSVC7. the MSVC7 .exe >was around 10% faster. > >cheers > martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.