Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 00:54:05 10/30/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 29, 1998 at 19:28:46, Helge Gabert wrote: >I upgraded to Rebel10 (at the higher price, by the way --- nobody has contacted >me and offered me a refund) and I'm a little dissapointed with the playing >strength. It seems like Rebel10 is s-l-o-w, and the anti-GM default option is >the likely culprit. An example: BT2630, #27. Where Rebel9 finds the move >e5-e6! after 0:53 on my P90, Rebel10 with anti-GM set to "smart" finds this move >after 5:00, and with anti-GM set to "off" still needs more than 2:00 to find the >winning move. This is just one example, of course, but there seems to be a >trend . . . I'm testing more positions. However, I do like the improved >database functions (the search mask in particular). So, I guess, I can always >use the Rebel9 engine within Rebel10. Set COMBINATION=OFF and try again. Worked for me (most of the times). Ernst-Jan.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.