Author: Albert Bertilsson
Date: 03:27:31 08/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 07, 2003 at 05:30:57, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>The Opteron was tested in SPEC. For their entire set of programs (also >>non-chess and hence non-bitboarders), the Opteron is clock for clock 55% >>faster than the Athlon XP. > >...and it's 74% faster clock for clock than the P4. > >For Crafty, the Opteron is 65% faster clock for clock than the Athlon XP. >It's 165% (!!) faster clock for clock than the Pentium 4. >(All from SPEC data) > > Opteron v Athlon Opteron vs P4 >SPEC 1.55 1.74 >Crafty 1.65 2.65 >Sjeng 1.70 2.05 > >Crafty gets 7% more speedup on the Opteron compared to the average program, >and Sjeng gets 10% more speedup compared to the average program. > >Based on this, it looks to me like the speedups are much more due to the >improved architecture (more registers, insanely fast latency, better branch >prediction, larger caches) than the 32 bit vs 64 bit difference. Crafty >definetely has more 64 bit arithmethic than I do. > >When running 32 bit software (or more precisely, software using the old 8 >register instruction set), the Opteron is 42% and 65% faster than the Athlon >and P4 respectively. The test I've seen so far was not that impressive in 32-bit. From which test did you get these figures? Do you have link or something? > >This means that, even when running NOT optimized software, a 2.0Ghz Opteron >is _still_ FASTER THAN ANY ATHLON XP OR PENTIUM 4 ON THE MARKET. > >-- >GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.