Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Crafty profits little from Itanium and Opteron versus Commercials

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 05:43:47 08/07/03

Go up one level in this thread


On August 07, 2003 at 08:37:47, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On August 07, 2003 at 08:08:57, Sune Fischer wrote:
>
>If you have a lot of inline assembly Sune, then you really
>can't expect the compiler to speed you up a lot. It's like saying:
>"optimize my path to get to amsterdam but be sure that you travel over
>arnhem and utrecht".

Right, but doesn't hurt if you're sure this is the fastest route.
If you're gonna write assembly, it better be good assembly!

>then you penalize it first.
>
>Inline assembly is showing in general a wrong approach to the problem of chess
>IMHO. Try inline assembly at an itanium :)

For portablity and maintenance reasons I agree, keep it to a minimum.
But when you suddenly see a few hotspost disappear when rewritten to assembly,
it's hard to resist the temptation :)

-S.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.