Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Crafty profits little from Itanium and Opteron versus Commercials

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 07:58:20 08/08/03

Go up one level in this thread


On August 07, 2003 at 23:21:56, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>Of course taking a look to how assembly works and what is faster for a processor
>is a different thing. Study is never bad. Wasting time on getting routine X to
>work in your own written assembly just to get your program 0.001% faster is
>really a waste of time where you write at the same time that buying an opteron
>is not interesting yet as it is too expensive.
>
>Just buy that bit faster hardware and don't make it in assembly :)
>
>Saves time. Saves money.
>
>Just throw some hardware at it!

Hmm, nice to see you come clean about your programming philosophy.

Now I know how you can afford to do things so inefficiently.

>Of course i won't say it is smart for everyone to throw 500 cpu's at it.
>
>I'll do that for them with DIEP :)

You are going to need it too.

>Oh by the way in case i didn't mention it. I can compile diep at that machine
>because i use NO assembly at it.

Ever heard of macros?

>I find it very funny to read that most bitboarders first slow down their program

I find it very funny that Diep uses a data structure that sucks for anything but
putting moves on a list.

>in case of Sune to get 30% faster using inline assembly :)

If you say no to go 30% faster because you have an adversity towards 5 lines of
assembler, then you're a worse programmer than me.

-S.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.