Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 00:00:39 08/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 08, 2003 at 22:48:22, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 08, 2003 at 20:29:33, Jonas Bylund wrote: > >>>going to have practical chances for a draw even against perfect play. >>> >>>Uri >> >>LOL! one tiny mistake and it is mate in x... (with perfect play that is) >>Also remember with perfect play, comps would not need an opening book, and a >>human would not stand a chance when it comes to playing perfect in the opening. >> >>Jonas > >We will have to agree to disagree. >Chess is a game when white has a lot of ways to draw and the best players >can play in a style that often avoid losing mistakes(at least with white). > >I even believe that there are a lot of games with no mistakes when the >theoretical results was always a draw from the beginning. > >I even believe that 2000 players practically played games with no mistakes when >they only traded pieces and avoided complications or went for repetition in the >opening. > >Games with no mistakes do not mean prefering a complicated draw and not a simple >draw. > >There are even theoretical lines when the game is finished with repetition in >less than 20 moves and I believe that part of them include no mistakes. > >Uri Uri, you have never lost an argument, you should have been a lawyer :-) Pichard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.