Author: David Dahlem
Date: 13:45:25 08/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 10, 2003 at 14:45:43, Thomas Lagershausen wrote:
>On August 10, 2003 at 13:51:59, David Dahlem wrote:
>
>>Thanks for these settings. I was testing it against other settings in Arena, and
>>it looks very good. But in this game, at 40 moves in 10 minutes, it makes a
>>questionable move. It played g4 from this position:
>>
>>[D]r4rk1/1p3ppp/2n1qn2/pB2b2b/4p2N/PPN1P2P/1B3PP1/RQR3K1 w - - 0 20
>>
>>I'm not sure which is the best move, but g4 is not even close. It's possible, if
>>given enough time, or a higher King Safety setting, a different move might have
>>been played. Here is the complete game.
>>
>>[Event "Beta9a Gauntlet"]
>>[Site "?"]
>>[Date "2003.08.10"]
>>[Round "1"]
>>[White "Rebel Beta9a"]
>>[Black "Rebel Beta9"]
>>[Result "0-1"]
>>[ECO "E14/13"]
>>[Opening "Queen's Indian"]
>>[Variation "modern Averbakh, main line"]
>>[TimeControl "40/600:40/600:40/600"]
>>
>>1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.d4 d5 {0.04/10 12} 4.e3 {0.11/10 17} Be7 {0.01/9 10} 5.Nc3
>>{0.10/10 22} O-O {0.01/10 12} 6.Be2 {0.20/9 10} dxc4 {0.07/10 15} 7.Bxc4 {0.20/9
>>6} c5 {0.05/10 11} 8.O-O {0.17/10 14} Nc6 {-0.01/10 21} 9.dxc5 {0.08/10 18} Bxc5
>>{-0.01/8 6} 10.a3 {0.14/10 24} a5 {0.15/10 24} 11.b3 {0.25/10 21} e5 {0.35/10
>>22} 12.Bb2 {0.24/10 22} Bf5 {0.24/9 10} 13.Na4 {0.34/9 10} Bd6 {0.11/10 13}
>>14.Nh4 {0.15/9 12} Bg4 {0.19/11 21} 15.Qb1 {0.17/10 23} e4 {0.11/9 11} 16.h3
>>{0.41/10 19} Bh5 {0.25/10 13} 17.Nc3 {0.44/10 18} Be5 {0.30/9 14} 18.Rc1 {0.33/9
>>19} Qd7 {0.16/8 10} 19.Bb5 {0.37/8 14} Qe6 {0.07/9 20} 20.g4 {0.41/9 10} Nxg4
>>{-1.41/10 26} 21.Bc4 {-0.50/9 19} Qf6 {-2.08/11 17} 22.hxg4 {-1.34/8 6} Bxg4
>>{-1.79/11 18} 23.Qxe4 {-1.33/10 16} Qxh4 {-1.76/9 9} 24.Bd5 {-1.96/9 15} Rfd8
>>{-2.60/9 17} 25.Qh1 {-2.33/9 20} Qxh1+ {-2.32/10 12} 26.Bxh1 {-2.24/10 1} Rd2
>>{-2.44/11 13} 27.Rab1 {-2.25/11 9} Bf5 {-2.33/10 12} 28.e4 {-2.26/11 10} Be6
>>{-2.37/11 19} 29.Na4 {-2.33/12 20} Bxb2 {-2.35/10 12} 30.Nxb2 {-2.35/10 5} Nd4
>>{-2.14/11 12} 31.Rcd1 {-1.79/12 16} Nxb3 {-2.01/11 10} 32.e5 {-1.93/12 14} Rxd1+
>>{-2.02/11 11} 33.Rxd1 {-1.87/11 2} Nc5 {-2.16/12 23} 34.Bf3 {-2.01/11 19} Rc8
>>{-2.21/11 17} 35.Be2 {-2.14/11 20} Nd7 {-2.27/10 12} 36.Nc4 {-2.28/11 17} Bxc4
>>{-2.86/11 8} 37.Bxc4 {-2.69/12 20} Nxe5 {-2.63/12 16} 38.Ba2 {-2.51/11 11} b6
>>{-2.56/11 18} 39.Rd6 {-2.46/11 12} Rb8 {-2.41/11 20} 40.Rd5 {-2.35/12 21} Nc6
>>{-2.48/11 10} 41.Kg2 {-2.37/11 20} b5 {-2.48/11 20} 42.Rd7 {-2.33/11 12} Nd8
>>{-2.46/12 13} 43.Ra7 {-2.42/12 20} a4 {-2.64/12 15} 44.Re7 {-2.44/11 19} Ne6
>>{-2.71/14 38} 45.Bxe6 {-2.54/12 12} fxe6 {-2.37/10 3} 46.Rxe6 {-2.39/12 4} b4
>>{-2.29/13 11} 47.axb4 {-2.22/14 35} Rxb4 {-2.39/12 9} 48.Ra6 {-2.39/13 24} h5
>>{-2.43/12 19} 49.Ra5 {-2.48/12 13} h4 {-2.65/13 11} 50.f3 {-2.45/12 8} Kh7
>>{-2.71/13 10} 51.Rh5+ {-2.65/13 9} Kg6 {-2.68/13 11} 52.Rh8 {-2.58/13 14} Kg5
>>{-2.73/13 20} 53.Rg8 {-2.61/12 12} g6 {-2.79/13 15} 54.Ra8 {-2.67/12 10} Rf4
>>{-2.67/13 19} 55.Rc8 {-2.60/13 15} Rd4 {-2.70/13 10} 56.Kh3 {-2.54/12 11} Rb4
>>{-2.67/13 10} 57.Ra8 {-2.54/13 13} Rc4 {-2.76/14 20} 58.Rb8 {-2.59/13 14} Kf4
>>{-2.66/13 13} 59.Rf8+ {-2.89/13 17} Ke3 {-2.69/13 24} 60.Rg8 {-2.81/13 19} Kd3
>>{-2.96/13 16} 61.Rxg6 {-2.97/14 19} Kc3 {-3.03/14 14} 62.Ra6 {-3.03/13 10} Kb3
>>{-3.16/14 15} 63.Rb6+ {-3.06/13 13} Rb4 {-3.27/14 20} 64.Re6 {-3.26/14 16} a3
>>{-3.19/13 9} 65.Re3+ {-3.19/14 19} Ka4 {-3.98/13 22} 66.Re2 {-4.80/14 21} Rd4
>>{-3.80/13 11} 67.Kh2 {-3.57/13 14} Rc4 {-3.92/13 12} 68.Kh3 {-5.40/13 17} Kb3
>>{-5.52/13 10} 69.Re3+ {-5.48/13 8} Rc3 {-5.53/12 9} 70.Re1 {-5.33/14 16} Rxf3+
>>{-5.74/14 14} 71.Kxh4 {-5.60/13 10} Rc3 {-5.73/13 10} 72.Rb1+ {-5.71/14 14} Kc2
>>{-5.85/14 18} 73.Re1 {-5.71/14 13} a2 {-5.85/14 15} 74.Rg1 {-5.82/15 10} Ra3
>>{-5.95/14 13} 75.Kg5 {-5.79/19 11} a1=Q {-5.96/14 13} 76.Rxa1 {-6.17/13 5} Rxa1
>>{-5.96/11 4} 77.Kf5 {-5.59/13 10} Ra6 {-5.85/13 21} {0-1 User Adjudication} 0-1
>>
>>Regards
>>Dave
>
>Strange, with 200MB Hash the BETA9a ENG needs only 1 sec to avoid 20.g4? on my
>Athlon with 1380 MHZ.
>
>Rebel 12 UCI 1 MB:
>T1 00:00 0,04 Lxc6 bxc6
>T1 00:00 0,11 Dc2
>T1 00:00 0,15 b4
>T1 00:00 0,39 Lc4
>T2 00:00 1,44 Lc4 Dd6 Sxe4
>T3 00:00 0,38 Lc4 Dc8 g4
>T4 00:00 0,40 Lc4 Dd7 g4 Lxc3 Lxc3
>T4 00:00 0,40 g4
>T4 00:00 0,58 g4 g5 Lxc6 bxc6 Sf5
>T5 00:00 0,79 g4 Lxc3 Lxc3 Lg6 Sxg6 hxg6 Td1
>T6 00:01 0,69 g4 Lxc3 Lxc3 Lg6 Sxg6 hxg6 Lxc6 bxc6
>T6 00:01 0,71 Lc4 Dd6 g4 Lxc3 Lxc3 Lg6 Td1
>T7 00:01 0,82 Lc4 De7 Sf5 Dd7 g4 Lxc3 Lxc3 Tfe8
>T8 00:01 0,62 Lc4 Dc8 Sd5 Db8 Lxe5 Dxe5 Sxf6 gxf6
>T9 00:03 0,48 Lc4 Dc8 Sd5 Lxb2 Dxb2 Sxd5 Lxd5 Te8
>T10 00:06 0,60 Lc4 Dc8 g4 Lg6 Sd5 Lxb2 Dxb2 Dd8
>T11 00:31 0,23 Lc4 Dd7 Sa4
>T11 00:53 0,24 Lxc6 bxc6 Sa4 Lxb2
>T11 02:04 0,32 Sa4 Lxb2
>T12 02:39 0,35 Sa4 Lxb2
>T13 04:08 0,42 Sa4 Lxb2
>
>TL
That's a big difference in hash size! Here the analysis on my PIII 933 with 28
mb hash:
Rebel Beta9a WB1:
D1 00:00 0.04 Bxc6 bxc6
D1 00:00 0.11 Qc2
D1 00:00 0.15 b4
D1 00:00 0.39 Bc4
D2 00:00 0.00 Bc4 Qd7
D2 00:00 0.25 g4 g5 gxh5 gxh4
D3 00:00 0.23 g4 Bg6 g5
D4 00:00 0.58 g4 g5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nf5
D5 00:00 0.79 g4 Bxc3 Bxc3 Bg6 Nxg6 hxg6 Rd1
D6 00:01 0.69 g4 Bxc3 Bxc3 Bg6 Nxg6 hxg6 Bxc6 bxc6
D7 00:02 0.69 g4 Bxc3 Bxc3 Bg6 Nxg6 hxg6 Bxc6 bxc6
D8 00:03 0.49 g4 Rfd8 Bc4 Qc8 f3 Bg3 Nf5
D9 00:08 0.31 g4 Nxg4 Bxc6 Bh2 Kg2 Nxf2 Kxh2 bxc6
D10 00:16 0.06 g4 Nxg4 Bxc6 Bh2 Kg2 Nxf2 Kxf2 Qxh3
D10 00:25 0.25 Bxc6 bxc6 Na4 Bxb2 Qxb2
D11 00:42 0.23 Bxc6 bxc6 Na4 Bxb2 Qxb2
D11 01:38 0.32 Na4 Bxb2 Qxb2 Rac8 g4
D12 03:04 0.40 Na4 Bxb2 Qxb2
Regards
Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.