Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I thought that DeepSjeng 1.5 was stronger than Ruffian 1.0.1

Author: Matthew White

Date: 12:38:29 08/11/03

Go up one level in this thread


On August 09, 2003 at 12:28:55, Uri Blass wrote:

>On August 09, 2003 at 11:59:36, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/
>
>I guess that Ruffian is better thanks to superior book.
>
>I remember that Leo posted results of the nunn2 match when Deep Sjeng won.
>but Deep Sjeng's book is not very good to win games and
>Deep Sjeng could score only 59.5/84 in the first division(less than 71%) when
>Ruffian1.0.1 could get 79/100 against better opponents that included
>Crafty,Yace,Gandalf,nimzo2000.
>
>For Ruffian's 79% see http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/his3rdedition.html
>
>Uri
Didn't Jeroen Noomen tune Sjeng's book?

Matt



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.